7
SuckaFree 7 points ago +7 / -0

Every person in my family and a lot of my friends that have ended up with skin cancer or other forms of cancer was a habitual user of petro-chemical sunscreens. But everyone else else who didn't use that stuff never got skin cancer.

The crazy thing is that all of the family members who sue sunscreen are adamant that us nonusers will die from UV exposure, even though evidence to the contrary is literally right under their noses.

I've noticed that with a lot of people, the programming runs so thick and deeply rooted that there isn't any amount of convincing them that they're wrong. It breaks my heart to see my loved ones like this, but I've reaign d myself to the fact that I can't save them all, so I've made sure to turn my focus on my children to ensure they will survive with th best knowledge and skills I can give them.

4
SuckaFree 4 points ago +4 / -0

Under the UCMJ, which would be the governing body of rules for military tribunals (if we ever have them), [they] would be entitled to an appeal unless [they] wave that right by signing a plea deal. The UCMJ's SOP is rooted in the rules that govern our civilian criminal justice system. [they] would be given a plea deal option first, followed by the option for a tribunal proceeding if [they] so choose. However, if [they] were to take things to the tribunal session, and [they] are found guilty, [they] would most likely feel the full weight of Justice come crashing down on [their] heads. Capital crimes like treason and/or sedition, 1st degree murder, and even a high number rape charges would carry the death penalty in almost every case. And since we know there's evidence of all those crimes and more being perpetrated by [them] over the course of decades (in a lot of cases), it's a better than fair estimate that a lot of [them] would see a firing squad or some other form of "final" Justice carried out.

As for replacements being made by the individual State Governors, it all depends on the rules of the individual States that would determine how [they] would be replaced. However, if we see things play out like we've been somewhat led to believe, then I wouldn't be surprised if most States hold special elections. Some form of Continuity of Government will undoubtedly need to take place, lest we risk our society completely falling apart before we can see this through.

If some of [them] are able to skirt what we would like to see as Justice and end up convicted of more normal crimes, removing [them] would come down to [their] deciding to relinquish positions themselves, or thru votes carried out by Congress and Senate proceedings. There have been numerous cases of Reps and Senators being convicted of non-capital l vel crimes that have been allowed to keep serving in those roles, albeit in a lessened capacity.

9
SuckaFree 9 points ago +10 / -1

Regardless of whether it shows an actual raping, which would be illegal and against Twitter/X standards, it DOES show nefarious undertakings, which would be enough evidence in any court to convict under Geneva Convention rules. Sadly, it won't be prosecuted in our realm. Rest assured though, God will have something to say about this when these animals eventually meet Him.

0
SuckaFree 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dig a hole about 1 1/2 ft deep. Put a container in it, cover the hole with visqueen, letting it say in yh middle directly about the container and secure it so it doesn't fall in. Pee on visqueen. Check in a few hours, and you will have water in the container and on the under side of the visqueen. Same concept as some high tech sponge, but way cheaper and way more effective.

This sponge doesn't defy "everything we knew at all." If you r ad the article to conclusion, this sponge like material doesn't really do anything at all but except dupe ignorant people out of money.

6
SuckaFree 6 points ago +6 / -0

Executed publicly. Doing it in secret allows for [them] to use other reasons fo death, like a sickness or accident, such as is the case for No Name.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federal facility houses on Federal land.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's what's coming after. The trailers and tents are temporary and were meant to get the facility operational as fast as possible. The company with the contract will be building permanent facilities in the future: prisoner barracks and barracks for up to 1000 workers, as well as the admin facilities needed to house up to 5000 prisoners. The environmental impact of the later facilities will be very real come 2030.

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Allowing these swamp creatures the ability to give themselves pay raises isn't [their] fault, it was The People's fault for allowing it. [their] votes are public record, yet The People have continually voted for creatures who are known to only work at the behest of the el'ites. This shows [them] that The People don't care enough about the country's well-being. And now it is impossible for The People to reverse this particular issue due to the rules processes of both Chambers. Hopefully enough of The People are paying close enough attention to Congress and the Senate to start holding [them] accountable, but from where I sit, it looks like that's not the case yet. Still too many RINOs and über Leftists filling both Chambers.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only 3 shots fired? This is NOT the way. Ammo is cheap, your life and the lives of your family are not. Empty the mag. Reload.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Be careful of priapism.

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

The shitty part is that the Naval Special Warfare Center won't close their beaches on Coronado Island/Imperial Beach. We have BUD/S, EOD, and SWCC trainees that will be doing beach runs and ocean swims today, multiple times today and every other day during their 6 month training classes.

4
SuckaFree 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Trust but verify"

No! Never trust a Muslim, but verify they're true beliefs by studying the Qu'ran and all the other edicts from the Caliphate after Mohammad died. Especially study their version of the Last Battle. Study the history of the Muslim Expansion. Maybe read Political Islam, for a better understanding in how Islam is really a political ideology masquerading as a religion. Those events and teachings give you all you need to know in order to truly understand Islam and why its members and proponents are so fanatical.

4
SuckaFree 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. The ones like her aren't the s-vest types. They're too cowardly. They talk the talk, but never walk the walk. The leaders like her are the architects. They get the dumber ones to do that thru highly effective brainwashing/programming and copious amounts of booze and drugs like meth. That's why she went immediately to feigned outrage. It's part of their schtick.

4
SuckaFree 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if he'll turn that lense on the State Govt and bureaucracy? They're some of the most wasteful, fraudulent, abusive, and corrupt in this State.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cue the bread line now, because that's all your gonna get with a socialist "grocery" store.

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tariffs haven't pushed up prices, the companies have and have used tariffs as the excuse.

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's original function, regardless of what is said on congress.gov was to ramrod FDR's Great New Deal down America's throat by strongarming Congress and the Senate into doing what he wanted. Since then, it's continued to be used a bureaucratic bludgeon by both sides. There are plenty of lawyers employed by every Senator and Representative who's sole function is to help the members draft Constitutionally adequate laws, bills, etc. The problem with eliminating the Parliamentarian position lies in the rule itself. It'll take a vote of at least 60 Senators to eliminate this position. As of right now, we'd be lucky to get half that number in favor of elimination.

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't like where this goes. And this Livingston guy seems like he's all in on Strategy/Bitcoin and is championing this.

Also, if Bitcoin is finite and capped at 21 Million, with all the people vested in it already, how has that number not been surpassed yet? Seems to me, if Bitcoin is governed by mathematics, that it would inevitably be infinite.

view more: Next ›