Article 6.3 should state SHALL be sought in place of "may" be sought. The word shall is recognized as a finite, direct order as it relates to any form of governance from any govt body and leaves no room for individual interpretations. The word "may" leaves too much room for individual interpretation, ESOECIALLY as it relates to how any form of govt issues orders, regulations, and/or directives and gives the corporations in league with the various govts way too much leeway in how they exercise such interpretations.
This is The Way.
Doesn't matter what the Fed Govt wants. Any power not enumerated as Federal reverts back to State's Rights. There's nothing in the U.S. Constitution that says anything about The People's Govt being ruled by overlords and overseers. In fact, it says the exact opposite.
Sometimes, the People must be shown. Wait til things have gotten worse, then watch what the People do come '24. It's not nearly bad enough yet. It takes the People showing up and voting in such numbers that it completely overwhelms [their] mechanisms for cheating. Or, if that fails, being angry enough to hit the streets and demand something be done. We still have a long road ahead to even get to those crossroads. Wait til energy, food, and fuel prices go up a few more dollars higher.
Buckle up, buttercups. And keep your powder dry. The road gets more bumpy from here.
Problem-Reaction-Solution
Problem: unregulated digital.currencies Reaction: digital currency bubbles begin to pop as "rumors" of corruption mount. Soultion: highly regulated Central Bank Digital Currency "adopted" by almost every nation the world, with policies and regulations following what WBO/IMF dictates.
Come get me when it's time to firebomb the place like Dresdin, Berlin, Tokyo, etc.
Until then, I leave it to the others to secure that battlescape.