Civil war won't be like the last one. It will basically be most of the ex-military and current military + other patriots with lots of guns and ammo vs. corrupted feds, a small portion of the military, and criminals.
The only risky part is if the left is in control of the government, they will probably invite UN soldiers in to help... call it an uprising/revolution/insurrection / etc.
It also won't be divided up by state... it will be the patriots taking all of the rural and outer suburban areas across the country, eventually surrounding all the cities... taking them one by one.
"...they will probably invite UN soldiers in to help..."
This is a weird misconception some people have. UN soldiers won't be called to fight in a war. UN doesn't have soldiers. Member countries have soldiers and the UN can ASK soldiers from member countries. I've served on a few trips like that since the early '90s. Those member countries decide on their own if they want to send soldiers to a particular problem area or not.
I know several countries, including mine, where the constitution forbids active participation in the skirmishes between the belligerents. We could participate only, if attacked ourselves or if civilians were attacked. My parliament would never allow us to be sent to US if there was an active civil war going on there.
Certain specific US troops train with my guys in my country every year and many of us have served together in places like Libanon, the Balkans, and Afganistan.
It would even be stupid to send us because many of us would support the US military in this particular case.
A fun little thought for you - let's say a lot of us (troops in countries who have served with US troops before), would tell the UN: "No, we won't send troops to US". Simply, because many of us would NOT apply for that particular mission. So who would send troops? China? Russia? Some African countries? With all due respect, troops from African countries are not well equipped, and if China or Russia did send troops, do you REALLY think we would fight alongside our "enemies" against dudes we've served together with? We would come in flocks as voluntary and fight on the US MIL side. Because I may not share your beliefs, but I share the idea of free speech and I will fight for your right to disagree with me. Let that sink in. Greets, MSG L. Berzerker
Fair point. This is all fiction, theories, hypotheses anyway....
The fictional scenario I've seen and I could see certain governments wanting to implement... would be our leftist/globalist government requests help from some of the other leftist governments (perhaps in Europe) like Germany, France, etc... so they are "invited" in to help quell an uprising.
This is all hypothetical crazy shit anyway. IF there were a "civil war" here, I think it would be over very quickly.
None of that really matters though, because Trump has already done what he's going to do and we really just need to sit back and watch what happens.
Civil war won't be like the last one. It will basically be most of the ex-military and current military + other patriots with lots of guns and ammo vs. corrupted feds, a small portion of the military, and criminals.
The only risky part is if the left is in control of the government, they will probably invite UN soldiers in to help... call it an uprising/revolution/insurrection / etc.
It also won't be divided up by state... it will be the patriots taking all of the rural and outer suburban areas across the country, eventually surrounding all the cities... taking them one by one.
The left really can't win.
"...they will probably invite UN soldiers in to help..." This is a weird misconception some people have. UN soldiers won't be called to fight in a war. UN doesn't have soldiers. Member countries have soldiers and the UN can ASK soldiers from member countries. I've served on a few trips like that since the early '90s. Those member countries decide on their own if they want to send soldiers to a particular problem area or not. I know several countries, including mine, where the constitution forbids active participation in the skirmishes between the belligerents. We could participate only, if attacked ourselves or if civilians were attacked. My parliament would never allow us to be sent to US if there was an active civil war going on there. Certain specific US troops train with my guys in my country every year and many of us have served together in places like Libanon, the Balkans, and Afganistan. It would even be stupid to send us because many of us would support the US military in this particular case.
A fun little thought for you - let's say a lot of us (troops in countries who have served with US troops before), would tell the UN: "No, we won't send troops to US". Simply, because many of us would NOT apply for that particular mission. So who would send troops? China? Russia? Some African countries? With all due respect, troops from African countries are not well equipped, and if China or Russia did send troops, do you REALLY think we would fight alongside our "enemies" against dudes we've served together with? We would come in flocks as voluntary and fight on the US MIL side. Because I may not share your beliefs, but I share the idea of free speech and I will fight for your right to disagree with me. Let that sink in. Greets, MSG L. Berzerker
Fair point. This is all fiction, theories, hypotheses anyway....
The fictional scenario I've seen and I could see certain governments wanting to implement... would be our leftist/globalist government requests help from some of the other leftist governments (perhaps in Europe) like Germany, France, etc... so they are "invited" in to help quell an uprising.
This is all hypothetical crazy shit anyway. IF there were a "civil war" here, I think it would be over very quickly.
None of that really matters though, because Trump has already done what he's going to do and we really just need to sit back and watch what happens.