Agenda 2030. Wake up or go to sleep. Armor of God is essential.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
If the current vaccines are a placebo, then why are there reports of adverse reactions?
As a pharmacist, I assure you adverse reactions are in no way confirmation of efficacy. Inactive ingredients can certainly have a negative effect on an individual.
I know that, but serious adverse reactions from a placebo? I imagine they would choose a benign placebo, like saline, because they wouldn't want to scare people.
Vaccines have to spike the immune system (hence feeling under the weather a day or two following vaccination) so they wouldn’t be stupid enough to use normal saline. Most people judge it working based on feeling some response afterward however inaccurate that is.
So perhaps you agree with me that the current vaccines probably aren't a placebo. unless they have gone to the trouble of substituting a flu vaccine or something. I'm not being argumentative, my cousin has taken it, I would really like to know what people think it is.
I reckon it is the first part of a depopulation dose, the second part being a viral infection which triggers an immune cascade via "pathogenic priming". This has happened with test animals in trials of similar SARS vaccines I believe.
:-(
So my grandpa's nursing home was just vaccinated. He said that 199 out of 200 people got vaccinated. He said that he didn't have any adverse side effects or anybody he's talked to in the home. It has been about 4 days. He claims no one has had any adverse side effects. It's either a placebo or its a miracle.
I'm not sure that's a big enough sample size or elapsed time. Do you happen to know which vaccine they used? That would be interesting.