446 It's about more than environmental impact...it's about energy independence and the fact that we have been denied safer/cheaper alternative energy for decades by those who grow fat off our energy expenditures, as we know it. (media.greatawakening.win) posted 3 years ago by Katrina241 3 years ago by Katrina241 +446 / -0 48 comments download share 48 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Liquid Fluoride (salts) Thorium Reactors, anyone?
https://energyfromthorium.com/lftr-overview/
Or.....
THIS.
.
Energy From the Vacuum:
http://cheniere.org The Tom Bearden Website
‘
... This is a fact well known to the scientific community, and was, for example, a favorite quote of Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman.
Two Nobel prizes were awarded in 1957 to Lee and Yang for substantiating the extraction process for this energy.
— Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (Ret.) - (referring to "Broken Symmetry")
.
http://cheniere.org/books/efv/toc.htm Energy from the Vacuum - Concepts & Principles By Tom Bearden - 977 pages
More:
http://cheniere.org/toc.html Table of Contents ~ cheniere.org site articles
http://cheniere.org/books/excalibur/glossary/014edited.htm http://cheniere.org/misc/bearden%20cv%20long.htm Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (Ret.) - Bio, CV )
This guy actually gets it.
Molten salt reactors are completely efficient but creating no nuculear waste means no arsenal profuction.
Almost as if we chose the least efficient nuculear process for a reason.
Safe renewable energy is out there, and many people who are engineering curious learn about their lack of application.
Not economically viable compared to uranium.