Curious as to why you would prefer one of the modern versions, many of which change the underlying doctrine/teaching to comport with modern (sick) morals and Newspeak, over one where translators worked to render the true meaning of the text, albeit in the language form of that day which, granted, takes effort for us to understand. I would rather have the truth in archaic grammar than easy-to-understand lies. It is not the translation per sé that is venerated, it is the truth that is venerated. It would be great if we could get the Scriptures in "this centuries [sic] language," but it is very difficult to find both of those in the same volume. But then, that's my trust issue . . .