483 SCOTUS Roberts took the position of lack of standing for nearly all Election Fraud cases on their docket. Patriots take the position that SCOTUS Roberts is complicit in swearing in foreign traitors on the People's property. How will he get himself out of this one? (media.greatawakening.win) posted 4 years ago by tumbleweed 4 years ago by tumbleweed +483 / -0 22 comments download share 22 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
How can a judge take the position "lack of standing" without first analyzing the evidence?
You're putting the carraige before the horse.
"Oh hai guis! I haven't look at the evidence but your case has no standingz!!!"
Correct