Has anyone ever wondered what a medical Doctor would have to say about Joe Biden’s current cognitive state?
It is clear that when you objectively observe his behavior, speech patterns, difficulty putting together cohesive and fluent sentences, and his loss of emotional control from time to time that Biden seems to be exhibiting signs of Dementia or Alzheimer’s.
Symptoms include:
- Difficulty in communication and finding the right words to use.
- Loss of Motor Functions
- Confusion and Disorientation
- Sudden bouts of anger (“I don’t work for you!”)
- Agitation and Anxiety
- Memory loss. Both short and long term.
- Forgetting the names of people and places. (Confusing his wife with his daughter/daughter in law. ‘They switched on me’)
- Gradual loss of speech.
We all likely are familiar with the signs and symptoms due to direct experiences with Dementia or otherwise.
As Americans, we have a Right to know what the cognitive state of our POTUS is and I find it odd that despite clear warning signs and symptoms of mental decline from Joe Biden, even when you compare him today with Joe in 2019 during the Dem. Debates, nobody has ever dared call into question his mental capacity and whether or not he was ever legally “incapacitated” at any time prior to 11/3/20 (or 9/8/20. See below). It is clear that his mental capacity has declined significantly. Yet, nobody can say with any real confidence if Joe Biden is mentally fit to hold Office. I would think an examination by an independent neurologist would give us some answers as to the mental fitness of Joe Biden to hold the Office of President. Unfortunately, cognitive assessments are not required of candidates, nor is there a cognitive function standard they must meet. HOWEVER, they cannot hold Office if they are “Incapacitated”.
FOR EMPHASIS: there is no official “ cognitive standard” that a nominee for President must meet, however, if a nominee is deemed “Incapacitated” prior to Election Day, the Party that nominated them must replace that candidate on the Ballot. BUT the deadline to replace a ticket or candidate on the Ballot was 9/08/20.
Incapacitated is a legal term and has a particular definition - “A lack of ability to manage ones business, property and affairs because of ones mental illness, mental deficiency, or physical illness or disability.” The legal general standard in making the conclusion that a person fits that definition would be whether or not an objective reasonable person would conclude as such.
A Party that nominates someone for President, who is found to be incapacitated prior to Election Day, must replace that candidate by the the Ballot Certification Deadlines (9/8/2020).
So, if the DNC was aware of Biden’s cognitive decline and “Legal Incapacity” or if the DNC looked the other way and allowed Biden to remain the nominee despite their constructive notice of his incapacity by way of the clear signs and symptoms of cognitive decline and legal incapacity he exhibited, they failed to produce a nominee who was mentally fit to hold the Office of President and also failed to replace that nominee according to the Charter and Bylaws of the Democratic Party by 9/08/20. (https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DNC-Charter-Bylaws-8.25.18-with-Amendments.pdf).
This results in the invalidation of the Biden/Harris ticket in the 2020 Presidential race. In fact the Jor Biden was likely unfit to even hold the nomination due to Biden being legally incapacitated (reasonable person standard) and unfit to hold Office. The DNC’s failure to remove a candidate which they knew was incapacitated and unfit to hold Office was legal negligence. I.e. a breach of their duty to American Voters (independents) and more specifically the Democratic Party. (Would likely need a Democrat to file the lawsuit to establish standing. Perhaps and independent voter.)
While there is no requirement that a Presidential Nominee take a cognitive assessment and display the mental capacity and fitness to hold the Office of President, I would think there is a novel legal issue and argument to be made that the DNC, or the RNC for that matter, has a duty to the American People to ensure that their nominee was mentally fit to be nominated for and hold the Office of which they were nominated for.
To reach this conclusion despite the lack of a concrete cognitive standard that must be met by the nominees requires the following:
As a nominee of the DNC for POTUS, Biden must not be legally incapacitated - in the eyes of an objective, non-partisan person, at any time prior to 11/3/20 and ideally AFTER 9/08/20 (deadline to replace the nominee on the ballot) was Joe Biden legally “incapacitated”? - Yes. See the above definition.
Does the DNC have a duty to the American People to nominate candidates that are not incapacitated? - Yes. Seeing as how you cannot hold Office if you’re “Incapacitated”, it follows that the DNC would have a duty to nominate a candidate who has the mental capacity (they are not ‘incapacitated’) to hold the Office they are running for. They owe this duty to the American People as registered independents and registered Democrats. (Standing issue)
Did the DNC know about Biden’s incapacity? - Yes. They likely didn’t have ACTUAL knowledge (notice) of his “incapacity”, but they had what is called “Constructive Notice”. In laymen’s terms, they should have known based on the symptoms that Biden was legally “incapacitated.” This Constructive notice would exist because an objective, non-partisan, reasonable person, would see that Biden meets the legal definition of “incapacity” and is thus unfit to be or even run for President or even hold the nomination.
So, the DNC has a duty to nominate candidates that are not incapacitated. The DNC breached that duty owed to the American People, namely the Democrat Party, by nominating Biden, a candidate in which they at least had constructive knowledge of being incapacitated, as defined above, and thus unfit for Office or nomination.
The DNC failed to replace that candidate by the 9/8/2020 deadline to change the Democratic Ballot for President. It follows that on Election Day Trump legally should have been unopposed and won re-election as a result. Biden was illegally nominated due to incapacity. (Hammering this home)
Conclusion: Biden was incapacitated, according the the legal definition of the word, and thus unfit to hold the DNC nomination for a Democrat Presidential Candidate as well as unfit to hold the Office of President should he come to win the election (both illegal due to Incapcity). The DNC failed to remove the Biden/Harris ticket as required by their Bylaws, which state they must remove a candidate or nominee who is incapacitated. They failed to replace the ticket on the Ballot by the 9/08/2020 deadline and thus had no legal nominee to oppose Trump on Election Day.
How is this remedied? File a lawsuit claiming the DNC was negligent in its nomination of Joe Biden for President. The DNC owes a duty to the Democrat Party/American People generally (independent voters) to nominate candidates that are not “incapacitated” and thus unfit to hold Office. The DNC was constructively aware of the incapacity of Joe Biden ( a reasonable person would see that Biden met the legal definition for incapacity) thus knowingly breaching their duty to the Democrat Party/American People to nominate candidates for the Office of President that are actually mentally fit to hold that Office or nomination.
Damages? American Voters and Democrats were disenfranchised of their vote because they voted for an illegitimate and incapacitated nominee who was legally incapable of either holding the nomination in the first place or holding the Office of President. On 1/20/21 Biden was illegally sworn in due to his being incapacitated and unfit for Office and the fact that he was incapacitated prior to Election Day and legally should not have been the nominee as a result, Biden should have never been on the Democrat ticket to begin with. The DNC had constructive knowledge of this incapacity and the damages were the disenfranchising of Registered Democrats and Independents. (Not Republicans. No standing because they were not “harmed” as Biden was not on their Ballots.)
Ultimate remedy? Removal of Biden from Office. He is not afforded POTUS immunity and his removal does not require impeachment because he was incapacitated as the nominee and should never have been on the ballot on 11/3/20 to begin with. The remedy is the removal of Citizen Biden from the nomination due to Citizen Biden being incapacitated at the time and through present day.
Under the legal definition of incapacity, the breach of Duty to nominate candidates mentally fit for Office by the DNC, and the swearing in of a illegal and incapacitated nominee for President, who was negligently put on the Ballot by the DNC, Biden must be removed and Trump sworn in as soon as feasible because legally Trump should have been the only POTUS candidate on the Ballot on 11/3/20.
TL:DR The DNC was negligent in its nomination of Biden to run as the Democrat Candidate for POTUS. The DNC failed to remove the incapacitated nominee prior to election day and also failed to replace the Biden ticket on the Ballot by the 9/08/20 deadline to change the Ballots. As a result, Biden was not fit to be the Dem. Nominee, he was not timely replaced and thus Trump was legally unopposed on the Ballot on Election Day.
Thoughts?
I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying here.
Don’t think about “The Plan” when reading this post. This is a potential legal recourse based on negligence of the DNC.
If The Plan isn’t real and we can’t arrest everyone, how could an argument be made to get Trump back into Office, or at the least get Biden and Harris out? That’s what my post is about.
I know we are all holding out hope, but forgive me if I can’t come up with a decent lawsuit and argument to file that results in the total takedown of the swamp haha.
But "Biden" isn't Biden. He's a stand-in - an actor - and probably controlled by M.I. We are watching a movie. I don't know why people can't see this. The facial differences are subtle but obvious.
Trump and Q have made it clear that we mustn't interfere. Our job is to wake to "normies".
Whew.
Yeah man, I get all that. Body double, stand in. Blah blah blah.
You know why people can’t see it? Because it’s pretty unlikely. I haven’t seen any proof other than somebody who told me “look at his ear lobes”.
Disney/Hollywood has been doing that stuff for decades to where you cannot tell the real bot vs the real human except some minor details. And pretty much all World Leaders have body doubles, Trump might have one playing golf down in Florida. (Barron is still missing).
I’m not denying their use, but again, where is the proof? Or at least something more concrete than “other people probably do it so it must be being used here”
I was at Disney a week ago and the Bots are still clearly bots.
But it was clear how easy it is to find someone who looks just like Rey or Obi Wan.
I’m sure it wouldn’t be hard to cosplay Biden and Co. in a manner that would fool a passing glance.
Lol. What does a DNA test or signature comparison have to do with whether or not someone was “incapacitated” under the law 6 months ago?
You absolute muppet.
So you don't have any idea either? got it.
That’s awesome research.
But unfortunately I find it more likely they kill him off and blame a Trump supporter.
Then Harris gets the ticket and they don’t lose any of their power.
I mean, let’s say a lawsuit like this were to filed and let’s say it actually got heard and given a fair chance to be heard, if it succeeded it would DQ the Biden/Harris ticket. They would both be gone. Trump would be in he legally should have been unopposed at the Ballot on 11/3/20.
I think it sounds great and absolutely how it should go. But I don’t see Nasty Nancy giving up her power. She can railroad through whatever retarded shit she wants. The senate will go along, and POTATUS will fingerpaint it into law.
Nancy would have nothing to do with this. You would file this civil negligence lawsuit against the DNC itself and claim they were breaching a duty to nominate candidates that are mentally fit for Office and nomination.
It would not involve Nancy, Congress or anything in DC aside from the Court you file the lawsuit in.
That’s outstanding. How do you PROVE he’s mentally unfit, though?
He’d never submit for testing, and even if he did, they’d conduct the testing in-house and say he’s just fine.
I’m not trying to poo poo your thoughts. Just trying to check them from different angles.
While “these people are stupid” they’re also unbound by anything resembling integrity or morals.
You don’t need a test.
The standard to judge whether someone is “incapacitated”, in the absence of an actual assessment, would be whether or not an objective, reasonable person (a fictitious legal person) would see Biden as incapacitated.
Interesting consideration.
There are issues you have not considered.
one: standing.
Who is to bring such a suit?
Venue and jurisdiction.
Then there is the following consideration:
A Trump presidency in the current balance in the House and Senate does not mean success. It means our Potus would be lameducked.
On the other side of the equation is letting Biden Harris go on the rampage and destroy themselves in the process. Because, why would you interfere with an enemy destroying himself?
What would this mean: I would expect real damage to ensue, hardship.
For now, this is still a federation of sovereign states. (see scotus considerations) and Amendment X: States Rights.
Standing: A Registered Democrat ideally or secondarily an Independent. Standing requires a Plaintiff that suffered a harm caused by the Defendant's actions and that harm can be redressed by a favorable ruling.
Democrat/Independent voter was harmed when the DNC Nominated a candidate who was not fit to hold the Office for which he was running, thus disenfranchising their vote. The DNC clearly caused this harm because they nominated Biden.
More difficult is getting a favorable ruling that would redress this harm. It would absolutely be a novel case of first impression as nothing like this has ever been argued before, so I am not sure how court would view its ability to remedy the harm or if they would consider removal of Biden the remedy. If the harm is that Dems were disenfranchised because Biden was unfit for Office, then removing him would not "enfranchise" their vote. They would have to remove him and have another election with a candidate fit for Office, I would imagine.
Venue and Jurisdiction? Wherever the DNC filed its papers to become a recognized organization. Federal courts in the state in which the DNC is HQ'd would likely have Jurisdiction.
Yes, Trump would be lameducked, but if The Plan doesn't pan out, I would rather have a lame duck Trump for 4 years than Biden/Harris.
In order for Biden/Harris to destroy themselves we have to hope things continue on as they are, so far so good because the Biden Admin/ has been an unprecedented disaster so far and even Democrats are seeing it.
I am not sure how Federalism and States Rights plays into this, though.
The Dems are going to beat you to it anyway as Joe was never the intended, it’s Ka-Mala. She’ll probably pick that gap-toothed idiot Stacy Abrams as VP.
And still, that won’t last long either (if they even get to pull it off) because from what I’m reading here, it looks like the GE Trump rides back in a 1st President if the new Republic around St. Patrick’s Day. If that passes and nothing Q-related has come to,pass, I’m done. I’m thinking about running for office of some kind, sick of waiting on the sideline for someone else to come to the rescue.
Wow. Idk what to say. No fucking shit Kamala was their luck you nope.
No shit we hope Trump comes back in March and unleashes a new age of Tech and prosperity.
Anybody have anything more than “Tick Tocks”?
This lawsuit concept was a concrete avenue of recourse that might be worth looking into or getting another opinion on. For me it was. Instead, let’s make sure every last post is only talking about The Plan and is only taking wild guesses based on countless inputs and the outputs are not concrete or even remotely close to 100% guaranteed.
I support The Plan and I believe in it, but learn to separate from it every so often.
Two words. Kamala Harris.
Several words: if this succeeded it would invalidate the entire ticket prior to Election Day. He would never have been fit to hold the nomination and thus Kamala wouldn’t have been on the Ballot as VP.
Two more words. Nancy Pelosi.
Lo. What, to confirm Biden is the same thing today as he was 6 months ago?
Y’all are like DiCaprio in Inception. The Plan = Limbo, very hard to separate between reality and fiction because The Plan is a “living and breathing document” haha. It’s never wrong because Nobody has any concrete information, just predictions by Q Team (admittedly very accurate and real as hell.)
This lawsuit concept is “reality”. An actual idea that is grounded in relatable and graspable reality.
But, as if it’s become a part of who this forum is, every comment’s content is somehow tied into the plan or in unnecessary defense of it.
Don’t get me wrong, I am a Q guy and eagerly awaiting the next 20+ days or so, but some of us need to work on realizing The Plan does not need defended at every turn, and a post that isn’t directly discussing The Plan does not = a shill post claiming Q and The Plan are bullshit.
I have also argued that those looking at definitive dates are'nt being realistic because plans need to adjust. The judiciary has proven to be unwilling to hear evidence or accept standing. And you are proposing a civil suit since it's against the dnc. So delay would be the name of the game. Not realistic for actual governance and ending this nightmare peacefully.
The judiciary never ruled on the merits of a single election fraud lawsuit. Every last one found a procedural technicality to justify dismissal before any evidence was even heard.
Of course, my post does not convey any long term solution to end the nightmare, I was merely thinking out loud and trying to come up with an argument that supports the removal of a President who is incapacitated AND the VP of their ticket. The result was needing to show that Biden was unfit prior to the election and thus should have been removed as the nominee.
If Biden was removed from the Ballot, maybe we don't see the same level of fraud. Maybe they don't go for it because it would be far more difficult to argue that any Dem other than Biden received 80m votes.