The right of the people to bear and carry arms Shall not be infringed

And yet, under the guide of sensible, they did anyway.

The 2nd does not tie it to life but to freedom, as a prerequisite!

Yeah..... Laws containing vague enough language encompassing everything, and weaponizing the court system, and stiffling innovation and freedom.

Dutch tax law just encompassed dao structures. And the most important of course is anything with a connection to The Netherlands.

Whatever that may be. But... If their previous behavior is any indication, like expanding into meaninglessness the term: metterwoon, i.e. those who emigrated, literally with the homestead, now you cannot even call your friend or mother, as it means a connection and that means you really did not leave. Or how about defining who is an entrepreneur by listing what such a person has to do and how much money it needs to spent on it. Or how about a gainstax on equity: if the asset rises in price you have tax liability of 36%, if it decreases, well, bad lich chummy, no deduction. So, now you have to sell assets in order to pay tax.

Crazy does not even begin to describe what this is

As the Roman Cicero wrote: corruptissima te publica plurimae leges, the most corrupt: duplicity and plurality of law.

Because your chief institution is the social structure itself, it is in this that we are most manifestly destroyers.

It is just a thought experiment. ....[/s]

and then follows a juxtaposition:

You gentiles fight because you like to fight; we fight because we have to—and in order to win.

He is wrong. We fight, not for the keks, or with the aim of winning. All true... what this quote very cleverly does is occult the what for question answer, the real answer . And the real answer is that which he despises, and must be destroyed.

We fight to keep that which we value, our way of life, distinct from his. And this destruction ensues as a consequence of political expediency, strengthens by subversion of our social fabric, until our women no longer sing the song of freedom.

And as long as they do, our families are save, our way of life is maintained.

I would think that the series: "Yes Minister" is sufficient material to KEK YOUR ASS OFF with these soulless and spineless actors shuffling in a chain gang.

https://rumble.com/v7bknxs-the-g7-proved-the-citys-rule-is-finished-and-carneys-warning-finally.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

For those that are absolutely disgusted with YOUTUBE and wish to turn traffic somewhere else:

https://rumble.com/v7bm2ns-trumps-fed-chair-ends-the-cruel-choices-era-to-destroy-the-city-of-london.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=67b9f9c4-8410-470a-ba3e-bbd6a6c59985

ugh .... and Barbara Specter said the same thing about Europe. And look at were Europe is today .....

I seem to remember, there was a reason why these people got expelled time and again.

Interesting to consider that both adhere to slavery concepts. One is financial: debt slavery, the other is more juvenile.

I already found it strange winning the presidency vs winning the presidency twice seem to indicate the age of these words.... The reference to burying 16 republicans ..ah ... I still fondly remember those debates .... hahahaha.

But it seems to indicate that the moment these words were written, is indeed years back.

Though I think the questions, are valid.

I saw the movie a last night. Short: It was pretty decent to watch, better than his grainy take the mickey out of certain genres: bloodrayne or In the name of the King

I would recommend it for AnonTheater.

Longer consideration:

1. Hammer's lines were brought with distinction and quite believable.
2. It puts Islamic rape front and center.
3. the viewer is confronted with migrant crime straight from the get go, a blonde mother is stabbed in the throat by a migrant in front of her child. This is not subtle, but brutal and confrontational. But of course not all are such devotees to migrant replacement, right?
4. The viewer gets to sense the emotional loaded question: has the idea of the poor immigrant taken hold, or does the viewer see something else: a group that is coming here for whatever reason and then forces its backward desert ideology upon our people by rape, molestation, theft and threats. The question is not about devotion to a godhead, but rather the moral decay fueled by the total betrayal of our institutions based on their socialistic ideology, including the managed decline of cities and public spaces.
5. The movie is dedicated to all the victims of migrant crime.

https://nitter.net/pic/orig/media%2FHLTbDbTWMAAeIjr.jpg

screenshot of the trying to walk it back.

hmmm... none of the wounds were life threatening. Only two needed hospital assistance. ....

And that is running around slashing with a machete?

Well done made reference. But I do have to admit, that jawa thing looks a hell of a lot better, and at least a deal could be made.

Nice! It also provided the graphics.

From the rape report: Johnson is wrong.

But, I can see why he his tiptoeing ... 1st amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof[..]

By disguising itself as a religion in our western traditional sense, where there is a clear distinction between church and state, it is capable of infiltrating this country.

We get down to the point, where Washington's farewell address becomes important. How do you roll back a lack of virtue?

One way to do so, would be to leverage immigration approval: People immigrating and even those visiting, have to declare who they are. And I do not mean in terms of names but in terms of virtue.

This then becomes a contract. And a contract can be enforced especially when there is evidence for breach of contract. Meaning: those who aim (mens rea) and promote a different set of "rights" than is constitutional run the risk of coming into hotwater:

1. perjury
2. fraud
3. 18 USC 241/242

Trump already took millions of barrels ....

And instead of Iran being beholden to the City of London infrastructure, now Trump controls it and Scott Bessent is the one pushing the button.

In comes the reconstruction phase.

But we are not there yet. IRGC has to show good faith: they are on probation.

Impressive.

hahaha, these people take it too serious ... but are especially triggered now that there is no swapping going on ... and the issue of migrant crime is put into the spotlight.

And I cannot for the life of me understand why they don't like it, as it fuels their one and lopsided view Americans are either cowboys or vigilantes. It should allow them to revel in TDS.

Beauty!

There are good socialists and bad ones according to Lenin.

1. Commies of course and socialists. These are globalists, and sing happily the "International".

2. National Socialists .... BAD, very Bad. But at least these provide an enemy image and raison d'etre to commies and socialists.

3. Fascists .... you know from: get it done, yes we can, Wir schaffen das? These are very very very bad.

Across all this run a group called: Straussians. They care not about the ideological type, but use its wording and framing to get what they want.

https://veiligenvrij.nl/timeline/

Start at 1795.

When done, turn to the 1781 entry to get a better understanding of the rot.

But in essence,

It is all in the family:

Hohenzollern -> Saxe Coburg -> Romanov -> Habsburg.

What connects the dots? House of Orange.

Think of these two books:

1. Entitlement to rule by Stephen Baca y Kerr.

https://www.entitlement-to-rule.info/

It tells you how the game it played. The above mentioned timeline contains entries for 1940, 1944, 1948,1953 show casing the way how this game is played.

2. Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947

https://www.amazon.com/Iron-Kingdom-Downfall-Prussia-1600-1947/dp/0674031962

After 1648, the period of colonial expansion, created rivalries, but based on internal sovereignty.

1814 took this system a step further. Under Monarchical supervision a Rules based international order was established, basically as a screen for oligarchic maximization of value extraction.

This was taken over by the CoL after 1914, as debt was the driver. (since 1750's).

The system remained the same, but who pulls the levers appears different.

1. debt must be acknowledged as the basis for diplomatic recognition, whereas international law requires only acceptance of declaration to sovereignty (treaty of Montevideo 1933)

Well actually .... two tops just resigned.

This should be on top of the hour every hour on every radio station

These were mostly peaceful rapes, enslavements and tortures

If you want some more info, I can point you to three webpages with sourced information from that time-frame.

The sources were not available before 2020. If needs be, you could use a browser translate.

It is a place they cannot control, image now the 250Kpeople have been banned from speaking out online,where they will do so?

Not on UK based platforms ....