1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

WATCH IT! EVERYONE SHOULD WATCH IT. WATCH IT!

Why the fuck would I want to lend my time to a low life like Don Lemon( sour grape par excellence)? Just because Elon is in it?

This is the best post in years.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

War Time President. No doubt about it.

Post-Office Philadelphia -> Army -> Federal .gov. Question: What happened to your postal account if you have served in the military?

Relation to sovereign states changed in 1871 AND in 1933. ( for the latter, see the books: Book of the States: incorporation = franchise.)

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

18 USC 241;

18 USC 242;

life = free = value. (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness)

vs

fringe-ment = meaning, putting a limit on it, enclosure / cloture.

Literally: infringement = like infamous, where "in" is a negation. Shall not be infringed means: shall be fringed. The exact opposite of what we mean. This is fraud, a bastardization.

Frya' s Tex - 7:

  1. If any man shall deprive another, even his debtor, of his liberty, let him be to you as a vile slave; and I advise you to burn his body and that of his mother in an open place, and bury them fifty feet below the ground, so that no grass shall grow upon them. It would poison your cattle.

Frya's Tex- 6:

  1. If ever it should happen that one of your people should sell his freedom, he is not of you, he is a bastard (literally: his blood is bastardized). I counsel you to expel him and his mother from the land. Repeat this to your children morning, noon, and night, till they think of it in their dreams.

If I might add more, I would recommend that all the respectable girls in the towns should be taught; for I say positively, and time will show it, that if you wish to remain true children of Frya, never to be vanquished by fraud or arms, you must take care to bring up your daughters as true Frya’s daughters.

What is the latest of in the Hoefication of our childeren? See also: plan to save the world.

What about language?

When Wr-alda (The Creator) gave children to the mothers of mankind, he gave one language to every tongue and to all lips. This gift Wr-alda had bestowed upon men in order that by its means they might make known to each other what must be avoided and what must be followed to find salvation, and to hold salvation to all eternity. Wr-alda is wise and good, and all-foreseeing. As he knew that happiness and holiness would flee from the earth when wickedness could overcome virtue, he has attached to the language an equitable property. This property consists in this, that men can neither lie nor use deceitful words without stammering or blushing, by which means the innately bad are easily known.

As thus our language opens the way to happiness and blessedness, and thus helps to guard against evil inclinations, it is rightly named the language of the gods, and all those by whom it is held in honour derive honour from it. But what has happened? As soon as among our half brothers and sisters deceivers arose, who gave themselves out as servants of the good, it soon became otherwise. The deceitful priests and the malignant princes, who always clung together, wished to live according to their own inclinations, without regard to the laws of right. In their wickedness they went [217]so far as to invent other languages, so that they might speak secretly in anybody’s presence of their wicked and unworthy affairs without betraying themselves by stammering, and without showing a blush upon their countenances. But what has that produced? Just as the seed of good herbs which has been sown by good men in the open day springs up from the ground, so time brings to light the evil seed which has been sown by wicked men in secret and in darkness.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/40986/40986-h/40986-h.htm

And there you go. Thanks, to among others, Francis Bacon who bastardized the language and brought in words that mean the opposite of what seems.

Example:

**definition ** de = negation = not finit = end/ limit/border ion = makes a noun or name = fact.

There are mane more ( introduction, intelligence, in formation, adolescence, basically, all the latin words can be viewed as a fraud)

So, while we ask for definitions, we actually ask for a "this and that", the scription of what is this and what is that, in order to help ourselves to know what we are talking about. However, the word itself means: no limit, blurred, a cocktail of several items mixed together. It may make for a nice drink, and may create something akin to new, but it is a bastardization!

distinction = we think it means: this and that, based on " definiton". dis = not
stinct = to push
ion = name-maker.

Compare: dis-honest = not honor - able. It follows: dis is a negation. In = negation. de = negation.

A bastardization of language of such seize comes with consequence! The bond between people becomes broken, bad culture, bad habits, bad morals. And the end result is always the same: loss of freedom.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

hmmm, peculiar choice of words: intelligence: in terra legere with the PIE-root as leg, which is the same root for law, lawyer, legal etc: what is known, laid down.

Positively viewed, it can be likened to putting a potato in the ground and watch it grow and multiply. Or like an initiation into a mystery religion, where the prospect is lead underground (Mithra, Bacchus, Pharaonic; Odysseus/Ulysses laying in his self-dug grave to enter the underworld), or buried into water and arises from it anew.

Knowledge and wisdom are two distinct matters. And in terms of frequency, cause and effect, it is of value to say what we mean, and mean what we say.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, I can see how a technology can change things. Since 2011 we have progressed 13 years in this technology, and bitcoin has been superseded left and right.

Initially,m it was mean to be a payment system OUTSIDE the FED without the means to identify the participants. Today we know better.

  1. Bitcoin is transparent.
  2. Bitcoin is slow.
  3. Bitcoin is expensive in operation
  4. File size of the ledger is such that it is cost prohibitive to operate: think disk-size and download size.
  5. Miners from China are predominant, meaning they are close at controlling the coin.
  6. In terms of gaining access to a reasonable rate of return on effort in order to secure the network and make it more democratic,Bitcoin needs a price of about 350.000 dollars. 7.Bitcoin no longer is living up to its design-meaning, as it is a form of speculation. The moment futures and options were instituted for bitcoin, it was the death of the idea. Hence, the growth of other coins.

The most amazing one: Monero.

And before one would try to counteract that., think about what Monero represents, and how it lives up to its ideal. Despite being shoved in the ditch by Binance, it took a short lived hit of 60% and within a week regained its position. Any so called privacy coin being pushed on central exchanges does not pass the sniff test.

That said, these 7 issues is not only an issue with Bitcoin, but many coins. Nevertheless, it is a god idea to have payment system outside of the FED system.

Then there is the ongoing digitization. The question of desirability is a question of how you look at it. Personally, I shudder at the idea that government in any way shape or form would gain control of such a technology.

So, yes, in a way it is a counter insurgency AS A COIN, medium of exchange.

In relation to the video: I agree with Kwast. The items we need to be successful. Basically, any means at our disposal and what we can think of should be deployed in the service of freedom.

Fun part: this is the message of the Oera Linda book. It is an issue as old as man, especially for those who comprehend what freedom is.

definition can be dangerous

Indeed. DE - FINIT - ion. => moving away from the finite. de = negation. Anything goes, the lines between what is A or B blurres. You could talk out of your ass and still be right. That is definition for you. However, we mean and intent the opposite. We want to finite things so we can see what is A and what is B. This helps the mind in solving puzzles.

So, what is it that is being put into motion when using this word? speech is energy, speech can captivate a mind. Speech = spell.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

hmmm, it seems we are about to find out....

AF-1 is a designation. Not a plane.

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same happened in Europe as well. Over budget and over time. E.S.T. every single time.

3
redtoe-skipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Darkness fall across the land
Midnight hour is close at hand
Creatures crawl in search for blood And terrorize your neighborhood

4
redtoe-skipper 4 points ago +4 / -0

I identify as a good guy.... End of story. Respect my pronoun.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

They need to so as to create the foundation of .gov power over personal choices:

  1. Energy consumption limitations.
  2. Assisted suicide called euthenasia
  3. Tobacco use
  4. Groceries like fish, meat, and not approved home grown vegetables.
  5. Rerouting of payments, like paying something for someone else.
  6. The amount of money spent on alcoholic beverages.
5
redtoe-skipper 5 points ago +5 / -0

In Sweden and Norway we have the same. Dark days of winter which take a toll on people's health. The summer though makes up for a lot.

5
redtoe-skipper 5 points ago +5 / -0

True .... but that only goes for white people. Many black people have VIt D deficiency due to the fact that their skin is less capable to transform sun rays into this vitamin.

There is also another issue: Sunlight is the basis of plant life. CO2 is the basis for plant life. But ... as an even bigger thing: sunlight and co2 are the basis of plankton. it is at the basis of the surface food-chain.

And I dare say: Sunllight could also play a major role in spirituality.

geisers deep underwater are the basis for the food chain there, and these two types of life are separated by quite a "nomansland".

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump's plane would have never have had a SCIF

That is a supposition, right there. How do you know that Trump Force 1 does not have a "SCIF"?

What does a President have to do to declassify documents? The general idea is that Obama took classified docs to his library. When he did so, WHILE in office (till jan.20 noon) would that mean these docs he took, where declassified by the sheer act of taking them?

This is an absolute power, isn't it? In the past, Trump has directed Barr to declassify the JFK files. Barr goes through with review by lower officials. But was that really necessary? When Trump says: these files are now declassed ....Are they declassed? Are they declassed even when the lower officials did not have their say and did not alter the signs on the documents themselves? Who' s power is tied to whom? Is the Presidents Power tied to the lower officials or is it the other way around?

The Deeps State tries to argue process. They argue that a doc can only be declassed IF and WHEN lower officials have had their say and there is consensus of such a doc being declassed by them. They argue the process and their part in it, is the absolute power of declass.

Interestingly, Q spent many posts pointing to the issue of declass. Remember the meme of nov.2018: DECLASS coming?

We are now in the thick of it.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Although the IDEA contained within the quote is typical for Jefferson, the quote itself is not from Jefferson.

Discussion of this topic is here:

  1. The letter containing the phrase: standing armies. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-10-02-0053
  2. Discussion of the quote: in terms of banks: https://www.monticello.org/research-education/thomas-jefferson-encyclopedia/private-banks-spurious-quotation/

In total, I would encourage everyone to read the letter (@1) because it masterfully delineates what a republican form of government is.

There is something else to consider. And that is the quote by representative Patman from Texas as seen in the 1933 Dallas (TX) Morning News, January 16, 1933, sec. 1, pg. 4, col. 6.

Given the date in relation to the existence of the FED (1913) it seems rather odd that he would say such. If ever .... but it already happened. Very cleaver phraseology. Fast forward to today, and we can see the corrected of this quote.

The currency wars currently raging ( Fiat against Fiat, fiat against crypto, fiat against Gold & Silver) is showing us, how all the items of this war, are geared against us through the employ of two major systems: taxation/regulation (law/statute) and futures/options.

The second allows for the manipulation of the currency, and by turning a medium of exchange into a production facility, and the first is the "skimming of" of our life-force.

Both systems are intertwined and are being funded by the same organization: THE BAR.

Rights are quite simple, and this can be gleaned from the first 13 amendments. A plain reading and a plain comprehension is all that is needed. Rights are plain, with a single meaning, and are truth (singular) and immutable. Statute, regulation however, is quite the opposite, requires interpretation, subject to change.

This same thing can be seen with Gold & Silver in relation to fiat and crypto. Why is that? Because the latter currencies exists as a derivative, like regulation / statute is a derivative of right.

It is important to cognize that.

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will make anything that does not suit them: illegal, till the idea of illegality is totally hollowed out.

There is only one thing: your right. And then there is: agreed upon rules i.e. contract applying to those with the duty to perform: i.e. government workers, be they representatives or otherwise. For them such laws count while conducting their business.

While the system eats itself up, it becomes clearer everyday that indeed a Great Reset is needed, but not of the kind Highpriest of Schwabism: Klaus envisions. Surprise! cult-Führer! Your Great Leap Forward, your Cultural Revolution will fail, and is failing.

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

As with the European Treaty of Lisbon, they can simply add 2 more rounds till they get the result they want. This is how Ireland was locked into the EU, an overwhelming no turned into a lackluster yes.

And now look at all those new Irelanders.

view more: Next ›