Both are religious cults and produce their zealots.
And from a political point of view, they indeed are two sides of the same coin as they both are at war with civilization. Zionism is better known as diversity. And that brings in mass-immigration of the the next wave of debasement.
I think it is time to leave the desert religare to the desert and to stop appropriating a mindset that stems from there.
An agrarian society is at the mercy of the climate.
Whether Joseph was hoaxing ... well. .... given the quality of his brothers and parents, I would not put it past him. Of course, the narrative weaves in Gods chosen status in there somewhere.
But consider this: pay taxes 7 years, and then when hunger strikes, you get to give all you have including yourself to survive.
Nice way forward. That the story violates Egyptian sensibilities is beyond the the story itself. (See book of the dead)
It is a blueprint .... that's for sure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiiUm7v0ilo
Er ist wieder Da ....
Well actually, he never left .... the Jews made sure of that ... He was instrumental in creating the Jewish State of Israel by means of Adolf Eichman (the man worked there for quite some time to make sure the plans were implemented ... and it is quite an irona how the Jews have hunted him and killed him)
And by means of the obligated holohoax religion, and calling out anyone not towing the party line as a NAZI, it became clear: he never left.
It is quite easy to comprehend.
planning always takes place on natural development, while politics is the vogue, overwhelming the natural infrastructure. Meaning: the Dems always pursue an economy of scarcity and thus victimhood.
Where did they get these ideas?
For those interested: Read Genesis and then the story about Joseph's adventures in Egypt. .....
Muh ... climate change .....Sound familiar?
You own nothing and will be happy. The Egyptian farmers already had that experience with these kind of hoaxes.
Same old same old:
- More .gov control
- more information sharing
- more exclusion of privacy
under the guise of security.
These 65 "crypto founders", are not founders at all. They are turn coats.
And, it is still possible to suffer from the I want it now culture. Even during the time period of 57 years.
It is quite passionate.
The DS wanted us to be uncertain, and thereby clinging to what we know.
Now, Trump:
CONTROLLED UNCERTAINTY IS A MAJOR PART OF EVERYTHING TRUMP DOES.
can be described as the same thing: Trump keeps the DS in limbo, uncertain, and thereby they cling to what they know. They hate uncertainty. They want predictability. That is why they suffer from TDS.
If you do not know what he's gonna do, and when, there is only one thing possible; a 24/7 state of alertness at defconn 1.
It is something like the Germans felt before D-day.
No it is Calais area. No it is tomorrow, tonight, this afternoon, now!
24/7 high alert + finding out it is a dud every time, fucks around with disciple, is exhausting, gearing towards giving up ....wearing down.
It is a bit like a fake breakout on the forex, stock exchange, or crypto chart. Bull traps, bear traps, false signals, ..... uncertainty.
Same issue with APPLE.
They are totally dependent on the CCP, and if they want out, the CCP keep their tech, their knowledge, their training infra, everything. Those companies have been stealthily been vacuum cleaned.
We got used to the idea of a take over, and selling of certain aspects of companies. But now, via the hybrid structure of bringing in a state sponsored CCP company, these executives sold out the business they were meant to take care for, and were paid off for this breach of fiduciary duty.
It awfully sounds like treason.
Yeah ... it starts by the feeling of: I want it NOW!!! MACDONALDS culture.
Patience and overseeing the board is difficult. The majority of people are tending to act on the basis of their anger, and about an equal amount based on frustration, some from bitterness and a few from disappointment.
Of course, it is all fueled by desire coupled with the bliss of not knowing.
Interestingly, another facet that can be observed is the lack of enthusiasm to DYOFR. In effect, the majority is deeply programmed to respond from emotion, not from dispassionate thought and analysis.
Example: `I quoted a Q post from 2019. Look at the last 2 years, project into the coming 6 years. We've already told you everything you need to know.
Next up: I encouraged the listener to read: Silent weapons for quiet wars in order to comprehend the nature of 5th generation warfare: a war for his heart and mind.
My reason: for those without knowledge, this 5th generation war knows a lot of twists and turns. And it is easy to get distracted. But two issues are always applicable: comprehension and loyalty.
Guess what? The response I get is: yeah, everybody is forced to stare at his own navel. `
My decision is then to leave it at that. It is not worth my time and life energy. If people do not wish to put their backs into it, RIGHT themselves ... what possible reason do I have to throw pearls before swine? There are then other times, no doubt, when that what I say, has more impact.
Maxwell is quite the history.
Ghislaine and her sister Christine's daddy was born in Rhutenia .... managed to travel from Czech republic to Brittain, changed his name, and managed to land a communications jobs in the army .... hitching up a French chick ....
And then selling books in the USSR, meanwhile buying up publshing houses ....including scientific ones ....
Inflation = money creation.
money creation can cause price increases and bubbles ....
But .... if prices are dropping .... then CPI should go lower, unless of course the basket of goods and services is changed for the upteeth time and focus is on California.
uh/#q[postnumber]
True in the sense that Wednesday a court case will commence, but not begin.
His only “crime”? Representing families whose loved ones died after vaccination.
No. That is not the reason. The reason is he wrote an accusation against the TALMUD. ....he dragged "the Jews" in there ...
So, they are trying to connect him to ANTI-Institutional Extremism. Although that has no legal definition, the Deep State in The Netherlands is trying real hard to create precedent. (The declaration of Independence or the Act of Abjuration would have fitted the DS definition of Anti Institutional extremism)
Of course they will drag it out. His detention is extended with 90 days in isolation. Easy peasy. This way he cannot prosecute the case against Burla et all.
I wrote about it here ....https://greatawakening.win/p/19BGqqqAE9/court-case-against-bill-gates-ma/
Well done Lupinate.
Put simply, when considering the laws of the universe:
- The principle of mentalism: “The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental.”
- The principle of correspondence: “As above, so below; as below, so above.”
- The principle of vibration: “Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates.”
- The principle of polarity: “Everything is dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half-truths; all paradoxes may be reconciled.”
- The principle of rhythm: “Everything flows, out and in; everything has its tides; all things rise and fall; the pendulum-swing manifests in everything; the measure of the swing to the right is the measure of the swing to the left; rhythm compensates.”
- The principle of cause and effect: “Every cause has its effect; every effect has its cause; everything happens according to law; chance is but a name for law not recognized; there are many planes of causation, but nothing escapes the law.”
- The principle of gender: “Gender is in everything; everything has its masculine and feminine principles; gender manifests on all planes.”
- What do you really care about?
It seems to correspond.
added: for the curious among us: https://quantumgravityresearch.org/portfolio/a-deep-link-between-3d-and-8d/
No online connection. I determine what it can and cannot read. This way, I prevent contamination.
Basically, the salient is point is not the vast body of bullshit created by bots ... I feed it the salient points of humanity.
I can then contrast it with several versions of AI, like perplexity, and see what comes from it.
In the end, I am the decider, and not AI.
One of the issues with AI is, that a word or syllable is just a representation of a number. Based on probability and statistics it tries to predict the next set of letters. That the outcome makes sense to us, is of no consequence. It simply performs according to an algo.
For instance: the word: de-finit-ion basically means: moving away from the borderline. So, when we inquire after what a matter is, we want to use such word as to put it in a border, a frame, otherwise, this does not differ from that.
So, in essence, we are using a word with a meaning of the **opposite ** of what we want and do. In regular life, we do not give a rats ass about it, of course. However, there is reason to be circumspect, because of the nature of the universe on a quantum level expressed with the words: be careful what you wish for.
It is just one example of cognitive dissonance in daily life.
AI has a hard time to comprehend that as a word or syllable represents calculations, a mathematical expression that needs following. It is void of meaning in and of itself. We assign meaning to it!
Mathematics is called: the language of God. I am not sorry to say: bollocks.
Mathematics is a model, an approximation that may or may not hold true. I can see the attraction of modelling.
Instead, I am trying to get my locally running AI to take in salient point to which to measure certain aspects. The issue I am running into is the use of certain words of Latin origin that are meant to be mis-used due to the combination of prefixes and suffixes giving the word a vector away from the thrust it should and ought to have.
Figuring it out in the moment, or after the fact, are two different matters.
Indeed, collectively we figured it out, perhaps not with all the fine point in hind sight, yet the road was clear.
I do think that a hindsight evaluation, like this one above, is important, especially it reinforces the arguments, q-proofs, and red-pilling normies.
When Trump said: You will not go into recess before this Bill is passed .... that is quite an unusual statement.
It basically says: play ball .... (= or ......)
They all know the meaning of OR.
Every AI does that.
Yesterday I simply asked to do a dive on the Green word: Priton - Pritones.
AI posited the the 5th century Greeks were accomplished navigators, thus calling the people living on the, what we now would call: British Isles: Britons, or Pritones, which refers to their cultural characteristic of meeting and discussion before making a decision.
So, I requested the sources where AI got his ideas from. There are no sources. Its a constructed narrative based on the idea of being aware of a people means contact, meaning: Herodotus was in contact with these people. Which is ludicrous on first sight. Herodotus even misnamed: Egypt, Lybia, the Nile, etc.
Then it became clear that the prevailing narrative of the books of Homer being a Greek story was the basis for its assertions. Which is ludicrous on its face.
I countered it by requesting an explanation how Menelaus could end up in Egypt, thus south of Rhodus, while being driven by a southern storm. I asked if AI new about other sailors of them days having the same experience?
And here you see the idiocy of AI.
It is fun to use, but is misses something, something that cannot be copied: Human experience! Why? Because human experience is beyond parameters and objectives.
The best AI so far, is my own trained AI. And actually, if you really want a good AI, you need to build it from the ground up:
2 issues:
- Land Patent.
- Only for US citizens.
- Foreigners can have only tenancy.
Otherwise China will buy land....
Well reasoned! I have to draw my hat to this awesome killer argument. Because it kills a boner.
It is becoming aware of the source of credit .... our life force.
The next question becomes how to leverage that.
Perhaps Trump's remark in Idaho shows the direction: Some bankers are nice, some are shylocks ...
what I take from the whole crypto sphere development, is that we do not need commercial banks.
interestingly, in Europe, there is an Island called: Sardinia. In 08 its economy was next to dead. In came CCC, a system developed by an obscure foundation called: STRO, headquartered in Utrecht.
They developed a digital platform in which each company could extend credit themselves to another participant. The monetary unit is called: SARDEX.
It used to run on cyclos.
Of course, the crypto coin market has vastly outpaced it. But ..... it showcases its power.
We do not need bankers. Bankers need us.
Yeah, and if you do that in Western Europe, you will be arrested and charged. The criminal walks due to cultural sensitivity. It is his culture to act the way he does. After all, infidels ....
Yebbit a BTC "shortage" was already baked into the proverbial cake... there's always been a limit on the total number possible to mine... it's not going to go on forever.
Indeed. 21 million coins to be mined is by definition a limited supply.
What makes the current situation different from say, 2022/2024) is that the coins are being hodle-d. AND: The on chain transaction volume is decreasing.
When coins in circulation amounts to two million, and 10% of it is being scooped up by big corporations and states to support their treasuries (collateral function)
- For a state: it makes the state financiable. e.g. 1000 BTC equal 100 million, NOW but in 10 years: 1 billion. or even 21 billion. SO, it is thought to be a stable development of equity. It could be used for future debt finance or, to decrease tax-burden.
- for companies: this directly influences their stock rating. After all, stock is equity and if equity increases, but the amount of stock remains the same => stock price increases. Or, amount of stock can be diluted to exchange equity for debt.
It means that on the big scale, adoption is looking to be the norm. Of course this means that BTC is moving from a simple payment system to something much more: a Collateral asset.
For Space Force, BTC is part of the "Full Spectrum Domination"-doctrine. From this point of view, the moves since January have to be considered.
I'm forecasting that there will come a point where everyone is going to want to liquidate/get out of BTC ASAP and then the value will race to the bottom while the frenzy ensues...
As for now: those who have BTC are happy to take worthless FIAT for it.
But it also shows, that people can simply create their own currency. It is a total defeat of commercial banking. Because it is there where currency creation happens:" by creating debt", first, a promise to pay". And what do you get? A piece of paper that says: Promise to pay. So, you did not really get anytyhing.
That is changing.
So, commercial banks are in a pickle right now. On the one hand: they loathe BTC. On the other, they wish they'd come up with it. Hence: XRP.
Personally, I think it is better than USDT or USDC, as these need ETH to function. And with every payment, you need to pay the gas fee in ETH. At times, uncomfortably high. So, I see a role for XRP in relation to the dollar, perhaps some banking assets management tool, intrabank lending, that sort of thing.
In terms of speed, XPR beats BTC. In terms of transaction fee: XRP beats BTC. In terms of decentralization, anonymity, control and privacy: XRP is defeated. It is not its core function.
States have a problem with it, because BTC is outside of their purview, outside their jurisdiction, BUT: they love programmability and scalability. Hence: CBDC.
The banks hate CDBC. They like the programmability, but they want to be the ones creating it by debt instruments. They run the risk of being cut out of the action.
So, there is a nice competition going on here. Hence, the reason why all these banks run into Mastercard and Visacard to be the processor of choice between crypto USDT/USDC and the fiat world.
So no, even IF the big corps will dump their crypto all at once .... (the strategic value of a BTC asset-network is to high, so I do think the probability of that happening is rather small), The People can choose otherwise.
This is the choice having been created.
Yes, and Cersei sacrificed all the nobles gathered in the Bailor in one swift act of revenge with green fire
Only to meet irony as her fate was made by a fire spitting dragon
Creativity of man known no bounds ...