The censorship on the big sites (Twitter, FB, et al.) is blocking discussion of real issues in the digital equivalent of a public square. This site is much smaller in scale and scope, so it is reasonable to police it for bad-faith actors and infiltrators. Imagine if you were trying to host a basketball game and someone showed up to play Frisbee instead. Would you be justified in clearing them off of the court so that the game could go on? What about someone breaking the rules of basketball? Should they be penalized?
This movement has no heroes, only people who seek the truth and freedom. There are many who are aligned with that goal such as Donald Trump, Sydney Powell, and General Flynn, but they are not to be unconditionally worshipped. I think the revelations about Pence and some other big names in recent months really reinforces the need to avoid hero worship.
I don't know or care about what Kellyanne Conway is doing. If she is indeed posting illegal content like that, I hope that she faces consequences for it. Twitter has proven to be very inconsistent with its enforcement in the past so we'll see. Have you reported that tweet?
Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town.
The ruling of this case shows a privately owned town has to allow for free speech. When an internet company claiming tax-exempt status because they argue the point that they are acting as a town square and are not responsible for what people of the town post. After they get the protections They want to act like a publisher and control what is posted at the town square they should either lose the 230 protections or be forced to allow free speech, can't have both.
I belong to a computer group that only allows conversations about one kind of computer. none of its members want to read about anything else, that site is only for that one computer. When joining you are asked to agree to those terms. I come to this site to read about Q and Q+
As for Kellyanne Conway it is a new story just breaking I saw a couple of clips of the 15-year daughter secretly recording her mom live. Having had a couple of daughters that age, Kellyanne's is very troubled. Recording Your parents without their knowledge is a very hostile act the girl needs help. It does not help when a house is divided, it will fall.
The censorship on the big sites (Twitter, FB, et al.) is blocking discussion of real issues in the digital equivalent of a public square. This site is much smaller in scale and scope, so it is reasonable to police it for bad-faith actors and infiltrators. Imagine if you were trying to host a basketball game and someone showed up to play Frisbee instead. Would you be justified in clearing them off of the court so that the game could go on? What about someone breaking the rules of basketball? Should they be penalized?
This movement has no heroes, only people who seek the truth and freedom. There are many who are aligned with that goal such as Donald Trump, Sydney Powell, and General Flynn, but they are not to be unconditionally worshipped. I think the revelations about Pence and some other big names in recent months really reinforces the need to avoid hero worship.
I don't know or care about what Kellyanne Conway is doing. If she is indeed posting illegal content like that, I hope that she faces consequences for it. Twitter has proven to be very inconsistent with its enforcement in the past so we'll see. Have you reported that tweet?
Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town. The ruling of this case shows a privately owned town has to allow for free speech. When an internet company claiming tax-exempt status because they argue the point that they are acting as a town square and are not responsible for what people of the town post. After they get the protections They want to act like a publisher and control what is posted at the town square they should either lose the 230 protections or be forced to allow free speech, can't have both. I belong to a computer group that only allows conversations about one kind of computer. none of its members want to read about anything else, that site is only for that one computer. When joining you are asked to agree to those terms. I come to this site to read about Q and Q+ As for Kellyanne Conway it is a new story just breaking I saw a couple of clips of the 15-year daughter secretly recording her mom live. Having had a couple of daughters that age, Kellyanne's is very troubled. Recording Your parents without their knowledge is a very hostile act the girl needs help. It does not help when a house is divided, it will fall.