Dominion sues Guiliani for defamation.
Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.
They will have to prove that somehow and Guiliani will be able to defend himself. How would he do that?
By presenting and hopefully proving the validity of his claims, i.e. proving that his communication wasn't false, i.e. that voter fraud indeed has occured.
Just a hunch, but makes a lot more sense than presenting the evidence at the Trump impeachment.
How do you know that it's 4 years?
Impeachment will revolve around 1/6 and Trump's involvement. When and how would they be able to present the evidence during that? Senate would rather let it slip into a total shit show than allowing Trump's team to present that evidence in a comprehensible manner. Never forget: Just presenting the evidence doesn't mean much. People have to understand and agree with it.
Just don't see it happen, sorry.
As ”fighting for the truth about voter fraud” is part of the accusation about inciting violence, Trump can prove this fight was valid by presenting the evidence.
True - although, where is your quote from? - they included his general stance on the election results.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/24/text
Sorry, it is not an actuall quote, I could have been clearer.
Ah, that kind of qutation marks. Got it; no worries. :)