These articles are so poorly written and there are almost no sources of actual info on any of them... I'd say they're pretty safe to ignore.
Trump isn't a squeaky clean messiah or anything, he's got some shade in his past... but it's what he's doing right now that's most important and what really matters at present. The other stuff, he can sort out with God.
Looks like all 3 articles are hit-pieces against Trump claiming Trump committed crimes or Trump did business with a bank owned by the Roths (how could anyone avoid that?).
Is there real evidence or just a lot of speculation?
Newspunch is always suspect.
Thanks for the comment bro
These articles are so poorly written and there are almost no sources of actual info on any of them... I'd say they're pretty safe to ignore.
Trump isn't a squeaky clean messiah or anything, he's got some shade in his past... but it's what he's doing right now that's most important and what really matters at present. The other stuff, he can sort out with God.
Don't forget bro' browser's en masse have been purged. That's why anything of note has been archived offline for the last 4 years.
Looks like all 3 articles are hit-pieces against Trump claiming Trump committed crimes or Trump did business with a bank owned by the Roths (how could anyone avoid that?).
Is there real evidence or just a lot of speculation?
You're right