I see your point, but there must be a law that says if the president and his staff are communicating in a said manner, then the public that voted for him should have the right to communicate back, via the said method. Do you see where I am going with this ?
They were aware of technological advances in guns and wrote that amendment as air tight as could be, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” yet here we are with boot prints all over the 2A.
I see your point, but there must be a law that says if the president and his staff are communicating in a said manner, then the public that voted for him should have the right to communicate back, via the said method. Do you see where I am going with this ?
No such law currently exists.
They were aware of technological advances in guns and wrote that amendment as air tight as could be, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” yet here we are with boot prints all over the 2A.