Im not lieing. I dont understand. So I followed up with the question asking if this research site is triggering action why can I not share the action to empower people to speak up? That is what im confused about and why I'm mad. So sorry if it seems im pushing it but I'm generally concerned because my confusion and follow up question is not being addressed. And its not helping others feel somewhat the same way even if its not the exact details.
Ok. Now I'm finally getting some answers. My confusion comes from one of the posts. If we are able to speak up my post was refering to Wikipedia not allowing edit reasonong with vandalism. I contacted wiki informing them I will no longer donate my 2 to 3 dollars. That was for a wiki info where the information was bias and didnt mentioned an important action. So maybe I crossed the line claiming they are probably funded by china. But you gotta understand yes we are researching and the research is bringing out all new sorts of questions and realizations. So I believe what I added to the topic of Q research even if it wasn't specifically Q quote it was related and could help the people analyzing the research look for another Q. So deleting it made me extremely pissed off because that is taking away from the meeting of the minds. Everyone has something to add. Ones strengths is another's oppurtunity.
Thank you. Some people do go over the top and irrelevant but even in an apocolyptic family if everyone is the enforcer they all will starve to death because you didnt have the diversity of farmers.
Im not lieing. I dont understand. So I followed up with the question asking if this research site is triggering action why can I not share the action to empower people to speak up? That is what im confused about and why I'm mad. So sorry if it seems im pushing it but I'm generally concerned because my confusion and follow up question is not being addressed. And its not helping others feel somewhat the same way even if its not the exact details.
Ok. Now I'm finally getting some answers. My confusion comes from one of the posts. If we are able to speak up my post was refering to Wikipedia not allowing edit reasonong with vandalism. I contacted wiki informing them I will no longer donate my 2 to 3 dollars. That was for a wiki info where the information was bias and didnt mentioned an important action. So maybe I crossed the line claiming they are probably funded by china. But you gotta understand yes we are researching and the research is bringing out all new sorts of questions and realizations. So I believe what I added to the topic of Q research even if it wasn't specifically Q quote it was related and could help the people analyzing the research look for another Q. So deleting it made me extremely pissed off because that is taking away from the meeting of the minds. Everyone has something to add. Ones strengths is another's oppurtunity.
Thank you. Some people do go over the top and irrelevant but even in an apocolyptic family if everyone is the enforcer they all will starve to death because you didnt have the diversity of farmers.