That's what I'm saying. I have no idea what this entire thread by Q is even communicating, lol. Was his answer a response to the guy? If not why did he quote him? So strange.
OP, here's Q#681 with links to archived breads. anon who posted "Chuck gave in on govt shutdown" was one of several replies to TI anon (claiming he's a targeted individual). Q was not responding to TI anon. if you follow the breads you can see the conversation.
Q is suggesting the Chucky's visit to the WH was very persuasive.
Did you even read that thing? Energy weapons? V2k? Forced motor movement? This person is certifiably schizophrenic. I have worked with schizophrenics and this is one.
Clearly they happen. Do they perform all manner of experiments on the same person for their entire life? Hmm. If you want to believe that thats up to you.
I already said those things happen. My beef is that I personally dont believe they do all those experiments to the same person for their entire lives. Thats the claim. You can believe it and im still gonna be polite to you. I expect the same courtesy for my doubts.
Why would they catch and release multiple people? Sounds like a strain on time, resources, and more likely to get them caught. Repeatedly experimenting on the same person seems more efficient logically. But I'm just speculating. Clearly the guy in the OP was released somehow, so who knows.
the shit that dude mentioned is real, it exists. is it happening to him? only he can answer that i guess. no need to instantly dismiss him as crazy without knowing him
If you were an honest person youd tell the whole truth. I am not as optimistic but ive been very clear that i dont approve of attacking q followers or trying to separate them from MAGA and i appreciate the optimism and research. You need a nap, you're cranky and rude.
So crazy guy posted about people hacking his mind. Then someone inexplicably quotes crazy guy and posts an unrelated statement about Fox News.
Then Q quotes the comment about Fox and says thanks for visiting WH.
I can’t follow who or why.
That's what I'm saying. I have no idea what this entire thread by Q is even communicating, lol. Was his answer a response to the guy? If not why did he quote him? So strange.
OP, here's Q#681 with links to archived breads. anon who posted "Chuck gave in on govt shutdown" was one of several replies to TI anon (claiming he's a targeted individual). Q was not responding to TI anon. if you follow the breads you can see the conversation.
Q is suggesting the Chucky's visit to the WH was very persuasive.
MK Ultra / Monarch programming.
You want to go down a rabbit hole -- research Johnny Gosch / Jeff Gannon and how it relates to the G HW Bush White House.
Whether or not one thinks q followers are crazy.. THAT person is definitely crazy
Did you even read that thing? Energy weapons? V2k? Forced motor movement? This person is certifiably schizophrenic. I have worked with schizophrenics and this is one.
Clearly they happen. Do they perform all manner of experiments on the same person for their entire life? Hmm. If you want to believe that thats up to you.
I already said those things happen. My beef is that I personally dont believe they do all those experiments to the same person for their entire lives. Thats the claim. You can believe it and im still gonna be polite to you. I expect the same courtesy for my doubts.
Why would they catch and release multiple people? Sounds like a strain on time, resources, and more likely to get them caught. Repeatedly experimenting on the same person seems more efficient logically. But I'm just speculating. Clearly the guy in the OP was released somehow, so who knows.
So you can diagnose someone based on an internet post??
the shit that dude mentioned is real, it exists. is it happening to him? only he can answer that i guess. no need to instantly dismiss him as crazy without knowing him
Believe what you want, and ill do the same, how do you like them apples?
went through your comment history. no surprise: you admitted you are not a Q supporter. deported, faggot
If you were an honest person youd tell the whole truth. I am not as optimistic but ive been very clear that i dont approve of attacking q followers or trying to separate them from MAGA and i appreciate the optimism and research. You need a nap, you're cranky and rude.