They have teams of people writing pure propaganda and deleting any corrections or actual info that's added. It's not even worth checking unless it's an article on physics or chemistry or something like that. Look at how often his page is being changed,
Yeah, I agree. It's yet another thing that started out great, was intended to be something beautiful and useful, got infiltrated by sjw / marxists / communists, and turned into a farce. Look up "the long march through the institutions", it's literally a communist strategy, undermine and defile everything while calling it "progressive" and "post-modern".
Wikipedia is not a credible source
Right...they leave out key points of info...
They have teams of people writing pure propaganda and deleting any corrections or actual info that's added. It's not even worth checking unless it's an article on physics or chemistry or something like that. Look at how often his page is being changed,
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_Trump&action=history
Its criminal...digital book burning
Yeah, I agree. It's yet another thing that started out great, was intended to be something beautiful and useful, got infiltrated by sjw / marxists / communists, and turned into a farce. Look up "the long march through the institutions", it's literally a communist strategy, undermine and defile everything while calling it "progressive" and "post-modern".
Anyone can edit the information that's why. Never cite wiki . Back it up w something stable
The point of my post was to illustrate how wiki sucks. Relax.