This proof is probably one of the easiest to follow and most convincing to normies. There is much more context to the data that is not included in the explanation because it would end up being too complicated, but it clears most concerns about the proof. A simple way to analyze this would be the following. Look at a set of Twitter accounts that have a similar number of tweets as Q has posts. Check to see how many times the Twitter accounts have 0-delta posts. I have a feeling you won't find many or any that are close to 9 0-delta posts.
Edit: This should be doable by using the awesome-twitter-data dataset.
The delta proofs were extremely convincing to me when presented in the Ultimate Q Proofs video. It's still on youtube if you're interested. The video made it clear that delta proofs were NOT occurring during tweet storms by the president. He also showed how Q used markers to indicate that a delta proof was incoming. It wasn't just strictly about the timing of the tweets, there were other factors. They are 100% proof to me. Undeniable!
Clip that. Skip ahead to 42 minutes and you'll reach the section on deltas. Those are what convinced me. If you watch those and still think the concept is invalid I would be interested to hear your opinion. Those are the proofs that convinced me of the concept.
This proof is probably one of the easiest to follow and most convincing to normies. There is much more context to the data that is not included in the explanation because it would end up being too complicated, but it clears most concerns about the proof. A simple way to analyze this would be the following. Look at a set of Twitter accounts that have a similar number of tweets as Q has posts. Check to see how many times the Twitter accounts have 0-delta posts. I have a feeling you won't find many or any that are close to 9 0-delta posts.
Edit: This should be doable by using the awesome-twitter-data dataset.
The delta proofs were extremely convincing to me when presented in the Ultimate Q Proofs video. It's still on youtube if you're interested. The video made it clear that delta proofs were NOT occurring during tweet storms by the president. He also showed how Q used markers to indicate that a delta proof was incoming. It wasn't just strictly about the timing of the tweets, there were other factors. They are 100% proof to me. Undeniable!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LHcg3CYHLGoR/
Clip that. Skip ahead to 42 minutes and you'll reach the section on deltas. Those are what convinced me. If you watch those and still think the concept is invalid I would be interested to hear your opinion. Those are the proofs that convinced me of the concept.