Did you apply the same logic to this proof? How many times did Q post about NN? How many times did he post about other people? How many times did a post about someone line up with their death? Why 30 days?
Q said 'No Name back in the News'. There was no news about No Name at the time.
I worked out all the probabilities, and decided that it was a best Q proof by a longshot because it is a stand-alone. It did not depend on unlikely things 'stacking'.
The thing about that proof is that it was down to the *minute. And it wasn't like there was a flurry of No Name news items. There was just the death notice.
Did all the other things he said about NN correlate to anything? Like when he said "No name absent. End near?"
Anyway, let's say he did know the time of his death to the minute. What does that prove? That he can see the future? That he can tell people what date to give as his time of death?
No, there were no major stories about his health at the time that Q make the drop, nor in the next 30 days.
The next NN drop: Every dog has its day. That was the hint that would be in 30 days, near National Dog Day.
Anyway, let's say he did know the time of his death to the minute. What does that prove? That he can see the future? That he can tell people what date to give as his time of death?
A military tribunal trial, the defendant gets 1 and only 1 appeal, and it can't go over 30 days. I assume they can enforce the sentence immediately after the 30 days are up.
So the answer to my last question is that Q knew the point at which he had a 30 day limit. So he announced his execution by saying that he would be "in the headlines". Then they executed him those 30 days later and announced the time of his death based on Q's post. Meanwhile, the MSM was talking about him having brain cancer because they knew he was going to be executed.
Did you apply the same logic to this proof? How many times did Q post about NN? How many times did he post about other people? How many times did a post about someone line up with their death? Why 30 days?
Absolutely.
Q said 'No Name back in the News'. There was no news about No Name at the time.
I worked out all the probabilities, and decided that it was a best Q proof by a longshot because it is a stand-alone. It did not depend on unlikely things 'stacking'.
The thing about that proof is that it was down to the *minute. And it wasn't like there was a flurry of No Name news items. There was just the death notice.
There was no news about his brain cancer?
Did all the other things he said about NN correlate to anything? Like when he said "No name absent. End near?"
Anyway, let's say he did know the time of his death to the minute. What does that prove? That he can see the future? That he can tell people what date to give as his time of death?
No, there were no major stories about his health at the time that Q make the drop, nor in the next 30 days.
The next NN drop: Every dog has its day. That was the hint that would be in 30 days, near National Dog Day.
A military tribunal trial, the defendant gets 1 and only 1 appeal, and it can't go over 30 days. I assume they can enforce the sentence immediately after the 30 days are up.
You are wasting your time.
I'm just asking you to cover your bases fren.
So the answer to my last question is that Q knew the point at which he had a 30 day limit. So he announced his execution by saying that he would be "in the headlines". Then they executed him those 30 days later and announced the time of his death based on Q's post. Meanwhile, the MSM was talking about him having brain cancer because they knew he was going to be executed.
Does that sum up what you're proposing?