Your suggestion that this is substandard as a Q proof is absurd.
Understand that my criticism of the Q proof is not that the math is wrong.
My criticism is that the detail involved in the calculations becomes very complicated with many many variables that have to be accounted for and explained.
It is not a useful proof for convincing normies, because you need to know all these details about how often POTUS tweets, how often the drops come, etc etc.
Understand that my criticism of the Q proof is not that the math is wrong.
My criticism is that the detail involved in the calculations becomes very complicated with many many variables that have to be accounted for and explained.
It is not a useful proof for convincing normies, because you need to know all these details about how often POTUS tweets, how often the drops come, etc etc.