People want her to be what she is not.
She's affiliated with the open society foundation, pushes the race lies, pushes the climate lies, wants gun registration/confiscation and it goes on and on.
Guys, don't be so easily fooled when someone who works against you happens to agree on a few matters - they are still working against you!!
Edited to add - I would go even further to say that I don't think ALL of the Tulsi pushing on this site and the old Donald is organic. Some is, as a result of the other stuff, but we see het brought up continuously and it isn't normal! I'd love for her to be on our side, but as of now she is not (and is unlikely to ever be.)
She is being shilled by Rogan, Jones, and Tucker for a reason. They want another "populist" movement where they control the populist. MSM will start lightly attacking her soon to get people like us to pay attention to her. Don't fall for it.
I think you're right, which is why I think some portion of the endless shilling for her on the .wins is not organic (though a lot of it probably stems from people who listen to Rogan, etc.)
It's relatively obvious she's the fall back if the ultra far leftist agenda backfires, but people think she's attractive so they cling to the few good things she says and ignore the 90% that's completely against their own interests!
Here's the thing you ridiculous fucks don't remember is that this MAGA Coalition which was formed to fight the DS included many people WHO BELIEVED IN SOME OF THE THINGS YOU LISTED.
I know of Tulsi from having lived in Hawaii. If she was "controlled opposition" then she would still be doing their bidding and not calling people like Brennan and Shiff domestic enemies.
And my username has been around from back when TD on Reddit had only 500 members. It was chosen as a red pill because it was the red pill I took when I saw what they did to Ron Paul.
I like the username, what I don't like is your blind spot on this topic!
Her calling them out is exactly what you would expect from a controlled opposition failsafe. If the push for overt communism fails from the far left, they need controlled opposition to it to rise up and take control of the movement in a way that will take it back in the direction preferred (Crenshaw, Gabbard, etc.) Uncertainty is the only unacceptable scenario in this type of mapping.
I get it. People can be convincing but still not in your best interest. Add to that the amount of pushing she's getting from MAGA-adjacent types with questionable origin and you have the most likely explanation: she is being set up to be a less extreme leftist populist who can take over for the extreme left and run the movement if they fail.
People want her to be what she is not. She's affiliated with the open society foundation, pushes the race lies, pushes the climate lies, wants gun registration/confiscation and it goes on and on. Guys, don't be so easily fooled when someone who works against you happens to agree on a few matters - they are still working against you!!
Edited to add - I would go even further to say that I don't think ALL of the Tulsi pushing on this site and the old Donald is organic. Some is, as a result of the other stuff, but we see het brought up continuously and it isn't normal! I'd love for her to be on our side, but as of now she is not (and is unlikely to ever be.)
She is being shilled by Rogan, Jones, and Tucker for a reason. They want another "populist" movement where they control the populist. MSM will start lightly attacking her soon to get people like us to pay attention to her. Don't fall for it.
I think you're right, which is why I think some portion of the endless shilling for her on the .wins is not organic (though a lot of it probably stems from people who listen to Rogan, etc.)
It's relatively obvious she's the fall back if the ultra far leftist agenda backfires, but people think she's attractive so they cling to the few good things she says and ignore the 90% that's completely against their own interests!
A pretty face is what got Whitmer in office. Change my mind. Ask MI how they feel about her now.
Grow up.
People have different opinions. Not everything is a fucking conspiracy.
Tulsi loves her Country just like JFK did.
JFK wasn't a Conservative. Just because he didn't align with Conservative principles, it didnt't make him the enemy.
Your screenname is msmcontrolsnarrative and now you're fooled by a "pretty face" that acts as controlled op.
Tulsi on the issues:
-End fossil fuels by 2050 and ban fracking
-Free college and healthcare (communism)
-Ban "assault weapons" and universal background checks
-Pro abortion and protect against gender identity discrimination
-Pushes the fake race nonsense
-Pushes fake new age nonsense
Yes, she wants less military conflicts and calls out social media -- WOW, that's like saying Romney is good because he wanted less taxes once.
If you consider those policies "loving your country," then your idea of love must be a sadistic one.
Here's the thing you ridiculous fucks don't remember is that this MAGA Coalition which was formed to fight the DS included many people WHO BELIEVED IN SOME OF THE THINGS YOU LISTED.
I know of Tulsi from having lived in Hawaii. If she was "controlled opposition" then she would still be doing their bidding and not calling people like Brennan and Shiff domestic enemies.
And my username has been around from back when TD on Reddit had only 500 members. It was chosen as a red pill because it was the red pill I took when I saw what they did to Ron Paul.
See how you don't know, or understand everything?
I like the username, what I don't like is your blind spot on this topic!
Her calling them out is exactly what you would expect from a controlled opposition failsafe. If the push for overt communism fails from the far left, they need controlled opposition to it to rise up and take control of the movement in a way that will take it back in the direction preferred (Crenshaw, Gabbard, etc.) Uncertainty is the only unacceptable scenario in this type of mapping.
I get it. People can be convincing but still not in your best interest. Add to that the amount of pushing she's getting from MAGA-adjacent types with questionable origin and you have the most likely explanation: she is being set up to be a less extreme leftist populist who can take over for the extreme left and run the movement if they fail.
Who the fuck cares about her opinions if they go against the constitution. GFY SIMP ?
By your standard.
But you are just a nobody on the internet.
By The Constitution's standards. You follow it or bust. Period.
Begone, SIMP.