do you accept the premise that we live in a world where all of the traditional methods of acquiring information are bad? you turn on the news or read an article and you will be inundated with lies and propaganda?
if you accept this premise, then how are you supposed to discern what is true or not? how do you find truth?
you have to put the truth together yourself. you brainstorm, you collect data points, you theorize. you accept what could fit and discard what does not fit.
you put yourself in the shoes of others, with a careful mind NOT to project yourself onto others. if you were a satanic globalist pedophile banker, what kind of things would you do to enact your agenda?
a basic understanding of probability/statistics is good. i find it helpful to view the world through a probabilistic lens. for example, let's say you put together a bunch of data points and potential
motives and came up with the theory that the moon landing was faked. assign a probability to that theory. perhaps 75% (personally i'd say 3%). having a mathematical perspective helps you identify when clusters of sheer coincidences becomes virtually impossible.
so with respect to Q... ask yourself... is there a greater than 0% chance that there are patriots in positions of influence to where they could feasibly wage a war against the deep state? would one of your primary objectives be to help wake up this country? how would you do that without jeopardizing your mission? does it fit logically that what we have seen is theoretically possible? can you come across a wide range of data points that increases the likelihood?
read the drops beginning to end with an open and critical mind. if you're lazy you can read the book of proofs in the sidebar.
let's try to play devils advocate. could it be a deep state psyop? sure i guess. why would they do that then? the complacency angle you see over at tdw is utter bullshit. the inciting violence angle you see on msm is bullshit. if you don't think it's bullshit we could have an argument about it.
could it be a larp? some teenager in his basement having a laugh? well it took a helluva lot of work and absolute genius to pull it off. i don't see how it's remotely probable that some random could pull it off. but perhaps you could try to make the argument and we could talk about that. but if that were the case, why haven't they taken their victory laps?
if you were a satanic globalist pedophile banker, what kind of things would you do to enact your agenda?
Well for a start I'm not sure there are all that many of those people. Certainly there'll be plenty of globalist bankers, and indeed a fair number of pedophile bankers, and possibly even some satanic bankers, although I feel there are far fewer satanists in reality than people here seem to think. But I just don't think there's going to be all that many who fit into all those categories. I'm also not entirely sure what by agenda would be, although I do think it would be at odds with the communism people here seem to be expecting Biden to enact.
so with respect to Q... ask yourself... is there a greater than 0% chance that there are patriots in positions of influence to where they could feasibly wage a war against the deep state? would one of your primary objectives be to help wake up this country? how would you do that without jeopardizing your mission? does it fit logically that what we have seen is theoretically possible? can you come across a wide range of data points that increases the likelihood?
If that were the case, I don't think my chosen method of waking up the country would be irregularly posting strange messages akin to riddles on an obscure message board, which ultimately ends up being frequented almost exclusively by those who already believe what I'm telling them, thus limiting the goal of waking up the entire country/world.
read the drops beginning to end with an open and critical mind. if you're lazy you can read the book of proofs in the sidebar.
Well, you're correct that I'm too lazy to read the drops beginning to end. I'm even too lazy to read all 635 pages of the book of proofs. I do see, though, that the very first drop asserted that Hillary Clinton was to be arrested on October 30th 2017. Are we to assume that this never happened? That it did happen but she was later released, and this was never reported by anybody else?
Perhaps you could point me in the direction of one or two drops which you feel prove unequivocally that Q is legit?
could it be a larp? some teenager in his basement having a laugh? well it took a helluva lot of work and absolute genius to pull it off. i don't see how it's remotely probable that some random could pull it off. but perhaps you could try to make the argument and we could talk about that. but if that were the case, why haven't they taken their victory laps?
This is close to what I think - certainly it seems like a larp to me. I don't, though, think it is/was solely to mess with people though; I think it was likely done by somebody who supported Trump being re-elected, who wanted to further divide the USA, and who felt that this would be an effective way to do so. This would explain why there haven't been any victory laps. Given that Trump wasn't re-elected, and given that, as many of you hoped, there haven't been mass arrests, be that at Biden's inauguration, before it or afterwards, I suspect we probably won't hear from Q again, as I can't see a way for them to dig themselves out of this hole.
do you accept the premise that we live in a world where all of the traditional methods of acquiring information are bad? you turn on the news or read an article and you will be inundated with lies and propaganda?
if you accept this premise, then how are you supposed to discern what is true or not? how do you find truth?
you have to put the truth together yourself. you brainstorm, you collect data points, you theorize. you accept what could fit and discard what does not fit.
you put yourself in the shoes of others, with a careful mind NOT to project yourself onto others. if you were a satanic globalist pedophile banker, what kind of things would you do to enact your agenda?
a basic understanding of probability/statistics is good. i find it helpful to view the world through a probabilistic lens. for example, let's say you put together a bunch of data points and potential motives and came up with the theory that the moon landing was faked. assign a probability to that theory. perhaps 75% (personally i'd say 3%). having a mathematical perspective helps you identify when clusters of sheer coincidences becomes virtually impossible.
so with respect to Q... ask yourself... is there a greater than 0% chance that there are patriots in positions of influence to where they could feasibly wage a war against the deep state? would one of your primary objectives be to help wake up this country? how would you do that without jeopardizing your mission? does it fit logically that what we have seen is theoretically possible? can you come across a wide range of data points that increases the likelihood?
read the drops beginning to end with an open and critical mind. if you're lazy you can read the book of proofs in the sidebar.
let's try to play devils advocate. could it be a deep state psyop? sure i guess. why would they do that then? the complacency angle you see over at tdw is utter bullshit. the inciting violence angle you see on msm is bullshit. if you don't think it's bullshit we could have an argument about it.
could it be a larp? some teenager in his basement having a laugh? well it took a helluva lot of work and absolute genius to pull it off. i don't see how it's remotely probable that some random could pull it off. but perhaps you could try to make the argument and we could talk about that. but if that were the case, why haven't they taken their victory laps?
Thanks for your response!
Well for a start I'm not sure there are all that many of those people. Certainly there'll be plenty of globalist bankers, and indeed a fair number of pedophile bankers, and possibly even some satanic bankers, although I feel there are far fewer satanists in reality than people here seem to think. But I just don't think there's going to be all that many who fit into all those categories. I'm also not entirely sure what by agenda would be, although I do think it would be at odds with the communism people here seem to be expecting Biden to enact.
If that were the case, I don't think my chosen method of waking up the country would be irregularly posting strange messages akin to riddles on an obscure message board, which ultimately ends up being frequented almost exclusively by those who already believe what I'm telling them, thus limiting the goal of waking up the entire country/world.
Well, you're correct that I'm too lazy to read the drops beginning to end. I'm even too lazy to read all 635 pages of the book of proofs. I do see, though, that the very first drop asserted that Hillary Clinton was to be arrested on October 30th 2017. Are we to assume that this never happened? That it did happen but she was later released, and this was never reported by anybody else?
Perhaps you could point me in the direction of one or two drops which you feel prove unequivocally that Q is legit?
This is close to what I think - certainly it seems like a larp to me. I don't, though, think it is/was solely to mess with people though; I think it was likely done by somebody who supported Trump being re-elected, who wanted to further divide the USA, and who felt that this would be an effective way to do so. This would explain why there haven't been any victory laps. Given that Trump wasn't re-elected, and given that, as many of you hoped, there haven't been mass arrests, be that at Biden's inauguration, before it or afterwards, I suspect we probably won't hear from Q again, as I can't see a way for them to dig themselves out of this hole.
Go watch "Out of Shadows" on Bitchute. It will open you eyes to actually how many satanist there are.