newbies, please increase your mental agility just a tad.... we talk of Q as an entity, NOT AS A PERSON. Q+ is a person... Q is "a group of less than 10, mostly military"... yes, there are underlings... do they know they are working for Q???? no friggin idea. I would assume so BUT, when trying to keep a secret, the more people who know, the more likely the secret won't be kept.
We, AS ANONS (Some claim the title of Pedes (centipedes)... or Qcumbers (more of a joke... trump saying he loves Qcumbers), we follow Q... meaning we look for drops and follow the crumbs to their enlightening bits of data we can learn from digging... we take said bits of data and "bake" "bread", meaning create a proof and disseminate the truth to others.... Sauce means proof of our findings....
easy enough to follow...
as bakers or just anons who learn and spread that knowledge, we can miss the point or even be off by degrees but we ARE ON THE SAME SIDE... as can be gleaned by our being here...
WWG1WGA - Where we go one we go all... a slogan if you will... from white squall but more significantly was on the bell on JFKs boat.
Now please, PLEASE, stop asking who Q is. That stupid ass question and "who is Qanon", are only meant for msm to ask... ask a thousand times and i will say the same thing EVERY F'N TIME... Who is Q? Q is no one... Who is Qanon or what is Qanon??? nothing. It doesn't exist...
we are not Qanons... we are Anons... anonymous ... we research Q drops...
understand?????
Can you cite any evidence for that claim or is it just your belief?
you sound like an MSM shill, NGL. Lurk moar. When you don't read the drops at all it's kind of lazy to demand answers from others who have. It's the research itself that illuminates you
My point is that there is no evidence for Q+ being trump. Just vague theories put out by people who dont really know either. There is evidence for Q+ being someone else. I am familiar with all the drops and community happenings as I’ve been following Q related topics since pizzagate. My research has led me to conclude that Austin Steinbart is a key player in this saga.
IIRC there are some time stamps/ known location/ tweets that ALL lined up to confirm this.
No he does not, otherwise you’d point me to the Q post that substantiates your claim. I am aware that there is a series of coincidences that support the idea that Trump is Q+, but its just as likely that Q+ is someone else. Why would they put an old civilian in charge of an ongoing long term military plan (that even Q has said will go on post POTUS)? The obvious answer is that Trump is not the big guy known as Q+ upstairs that everyone is taking orders from. If your future self attempted to help you, would you refuse? What is the looking glass?