there is no other option. why? because when people try to debunk Q all they could come up with is the crazy claims that people make but anyone out to discredit Q has still not explained the mathematical impossibilties of some of Qs posts and when they claim to know who started it. the person claiming to start it cant explain it either. so its either Q is real or its quantum computing
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
I agree that there has been enough evidence to confirm that Q is real and connected with military planning. I agree that there is enough evidence to confirm that the Q plan is fighting against many things we see as evil, such as sex trafficking, and for a return to the original constitution, and thus, something to agree with and support.
It is true that Q posts quote from the Bible and mention God.
What remains unclear for me is how much of the Hegelian Dialectic is at work here.
Most people put it as a war between two forces: Light working against Darkness. Good vs. evil.
But the Word also tells us that there is a false light. **So there are three categories we need to be discerning, not just two. **
A false light fighting against evil would distract from the question of the source. It would keep people focused on a distraction, what could be "in-fighting" for appearance of good....and keep people away from focusing on what is really good.
For those who believe in the God of the Bible, we say that what is good is what the Word says is good.
A Bible comparison is the two trees in the garden:
Tree of Life/Good per God vs. the Tree of the Knowledge of good and evil/ not good per God: with two sides in itself.
so three categories, as above.
The best lies contain a great deal of truth.