According to this news story, Jeffrey Epstein is "The Kraken" and is going to spill the beans on Joe and Hunter Biden: https://realrawnews.com/2021/01/epstein-the-kraken-escaped-federal-custody-during-6-jan-riots/
This article claims that Joe Biden has placed a $10,000,000 bounty (Dead or Alive) on Jeffrey "the Kraken" Epstein due to this wildcard in play that will bring down the corrupt government: https://realrawnews.com/2021/01/biden-offers-10000000-bounty-for-jeffery-the-kraken-epstein-dead-or-alive/
Now I have to revisit a question I thought was already solved: Whose voice was it that was overlaid atop Joe Biden's COVID address here? https://youtu.be/hu8IpGiWpso?t=60
For your reference here are interviews to listen to their voices to determine who's:
-
Jeffrey Epstein interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeGMzQ1bRyo
-
Hunter Biden interview: https://youtu.be/u9AgAx2Adl0?t=356
It's not Hunter or Epstein. It's Becerra. It's not even logical to be Hunter or Epstein. Seriously, it's common sense.
There's absolutely NO way it is Becerra. I posted his interviews earlier. The voice doesn't match whatsoever. Sorry.
Then you're delusional and making everyone else that listens to you look foolish.
It's not even common sense for it to be Hunter Biden or even more insanely - Epstein. They were literally introducing Becerra up next. They were micing him up. He was talking about prosecutions. He's an Attorney General.
I mean whatever dude, you're not going to accept reason. You're stuck on your way of thinking. That's your problem. Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug.
Amazin! I'm stunned by your remarks and frankly your lack of logic. You seem to be entire oblivious to using your senses and deductive reasoning. You're entirely off base here.
Why would it be Epstein?
Or Hunter?
Why would it not be Becerra? Becerra was about to speak and he was being mic'd up. He's a prosecutor. He was informing the press pool about his professional life. One of his last duties as CA AG was to issue a plea deal to someone.
Why would Epstein be talking about his "Life"? Everyone knows about Epstein and his crimes. Wouldn't they be more shocked that he's alive? He wouldn't start off a conversation with "just so you know my life". He's most likely place it like "I know it must be a shock, but I was put in witpro and have since entered a plea deal." or something to that effect. Not "Just so you know my life".
Hunter Biden is hot real estate for news. Wouldn't those listening to Hunter talk about a secretive "plea deal" be in the know? I'm sorry, but the media would leak that. They'd allude to it. They wouldn't need to be "informed". "Just so you know my life" has no linguistic place in such a setting. They know his life. If he WERE to be talking about that, he wouldn't need to pre-face it with "just so you know my life."
However...
"Just so you know my life" absolutely has a place in the setting of a relative no-one AG, from CA being appointed to something by the President. D.C reporters aren't going to know or care about an AG from CA. He's informing them of his professional life "Just so you know my life, I did ____ before I came here".
The most logical explanation is usually the most logical explanation.