Based on what I can gather, the gist is that AZ legislator found out they have the power to demand a full forensic audit. They did so, and the election officials hired a team that wouldn't find anything in hopes of shutting them up. Due to that, the legislature hired an independent expert team led by Col. Phil Waldron. The election officials have done everything they can to prevent this audit, but have failed to stop it. The audit will begin Wednesday and take up to 10 days. This might really be it.
State of WI already did that PRIOR to electoral vote count on Jan. 6. WI Supreme Court threw out 200,000 fake ballots, easily giving Trump the state.
Can you please remind us how that was the "it" so many here keep on pointing out. I see some sort of a "this is it, guys!" posted here for weeks now. Once the audit concludes and the results prove that Dominion machines as well as printed ballots were fraudulent, what do YOU think will happen?
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought an actual audit didnt happen there. That all that happened in Wisconsin was they somehow proved 200k mailins were unrequested which is contrary to state law. Then the Democrats argued their typical "blah blah, racist, blah blah, pandemic" rhetoric and it went nowhere. This forensic audit would be different proving definitively which votes were switched, which votes were fake or illegal etc. How could they argue out of that?
They audited BALLOTS, and proved to the WI Supreme Court they were fraudulent. How is that not an "audit". Not a complete audit, but an audit by definition. All taking place prior to Jan. 6 electoral count, easily giving Trump the state.
They also ALREADY audited a few Dominion machines in state of GA, in a very conservative county, proving that they were rigged to throw the votes to Zhou Bai Den. They fed 100 ballots each for Trump and Zhou Bai Den, and time after time Dominion counted 87 for Trump and 113 for Zhou Bai Den. They also proved that ALL Dominion machines were hooked up to internet via WiFi modems, Chi-Com made.
How is that not an "audit", either? What do you think an audit is? There are different levels of depth for an audit, but all of those were still an "audit", one way or another, and ALL of them easily proved election fraud.
I wonder what the poster's thoughts are on this? I want context first. Must be new so I'll take the time ....but not for the video.
Based on what I can gather, the gist is that AZ legislator found out they have the power to demand a full forensic audit. They did so, and the election officials hired a team that wouldn't find anything in hopes of shutting them up. Due to that, the legislature hired an independent expert team led by Col. Phil Waldron. The election officials have done everything they can to prevent this audit, but have failed to stop it. The audit will begin Wednesday and take up to 10 days. This might really be it.
State of WI already did that PRIOR to electoral vote count on Jan. 6. WI Supreme Court threw out 200,000 fake ballots, easily giving Trump the state.
Can you please remind us how that was the "it" so many here keep on pointing out. I see some sort of a "this is it, guys!" posted here for weeks now. Once the audit concludes and the results prove that Dominion machines as well as printed ballots were fraudulent, what do YOU think will happen?
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought an actual audit didnt happen there. That all that happened in Wisconsin was they somehow proved 200k mailins were unrequested which is contrary to state law. Then the Democrats argued their typical "blah blah, racist, blah blah, pandemic" rhetoric and it went nowhere. This forensic audit would be different proving definitively which votes were switched, which votes were fake or illegal etc. How could they argue out of that?
They audited BALLOTS, and proved to the WI Supreme Court they were fraudulent. How is that not an "audit". Not a complete audit, but an audit by definition. All taking place prior to Jan. 6 electoral count, easily giving Trump the state.
They also ALREADY audited a few Dominion machines in state of GA, in a very conservative county, proving that they were rigged to throw the votes to Zhou Bai Den. They fed 100 ballots each for Trump and Zhou Bai Den, and time after time Dominion counted 87 for Trump and 113 for Zhou Bai Den. They also proved that ALL Dominion machines were hooked up to internet via WiFi modems, Chi-Com made.
How is that not an "audit", either? What do you think an audit is? There are different levels of depth for an audit, but all of those were still an "audit", one way or another, and ALL of them easily proved election fraud.