We know the accounts are not from the real general.
But we are banned across social media. They remove all our content.
And yet they exist on telegram. But the problem is how to find? Q is censored everywhere. Entire collections deleted.
General mclnemey is just working as a “key word” to find these groups. And by such means find some of the lost content they might be banning.
It’s not that we believe the general is “real” or that the controller of those “groups” are legit...
But neither is most YouTube channels. They all post many random things we may agree or disagree with.
But the greater point is that there might be one good video. Or one good post. These are posts systematically censored.
I would also like to add - that these forums on great awakening.win still don’t have the ability for us to upload video... and make this website a primary source for our videos. As such - we are constantly in need of external host servers and applications.
The "channel name" is irrelevant. Youtube is a video hosting platform, so unless someone is linking a powerpoint presentation and claiming it's from a government official, the video will speak for itself, verifying who it is that's speaking. A video of Donald Trump speaking is a video of Donald Trump speaking. Unless it's a deepfake.
The difference with Telegram is that it contains a flood of unverified imposters pretending their written messages are coming from the real deal. The "account name" is actually significant. Written messages, unlike video or even audio, do not even begin to prove who the source is. So unless you have confirmation from the real person that they run the account, it's a waste of everyone's time to acknowledge the charade.
You basically give them the power to raise false alarms or give false hope, over and over, all day long. You also give them the power to mislead in a much more malicious fashion once you've helped them to attain tens of thousands of followers who actually believe the account is real. I remember fake accounts on Parler with 100k+ followers.
I feel this is a mistake.
And please hear my reasoning.
We know the accounts are not from the real general.
But we are banned across social media. They remove all our content.
And yet they exist on telegram. But the problem is how to find? Q is censored everywhere. Entire collections deleted.
General mclnemey is just working as a “key word” to find these groups. And by such means find some of the lost content they might be banning.
It’s not that we believe the general is “real” or that the controller of those “groups” are legit...
But neither is most YouTube channels. They all post many random things we may agree or disagree with.
But the greater point is that there might be one good video. Or one good post. These are posts systematically censored.
I would also like to add - that these forums on great awakening.win still don’t have the ability for us to upload video... and make this website a primary source for our videos. As such - we are constantly in need of external host servers and applications.
Download video and upload to Rumble, Bitchute, or Streamable?
Those platforms are inferior. Many times bitchute doesn’t even load.
I get you prefer them.
But I find it ironic how nobody cries about YouTube - and then cry about telegram and the name of the “channel name”.
Nobody ever cries about the channel name in YouTube.
And to find sources on Internet when Q and WWG1WGA is completely automated and scrubbed off the internet... it’s like shooting ourselves in the foot.
Censorship shows no remorse. Why would we want to also limit our sources and platforms.
The "channel name" is irrelevant. Youtube is a video hosting platform, so unless someone is linking a powerpoint presentation and claiming it's from a government official, the video will speak for itself, verifying who it is that's speaking. A video of Donald Trump speaking is a video of Donald Trump speaking. Unless it's a deepfake.
The difference with Telegram is that it contains a flood of unverified imposters pretending their written messages are coming from the real deal. The "account name" is actually significant. Written messages, unlike video or even audio, do not even begin to prove who the source is. So unless you have confirmation from the real person that they run the account, it's a waste of everyone's time to acknowledge the charade.
You basically give them the power to raise false alarms or give false hope, over and over, all day long. You also give them the power to mislead in a much more malicious fashion once you've helped them to attain tens of thousands of followers who actually believe the account is real. I remember fake accounts on Parler with 100k+ followers.
So then the name Q should also be banned then? Just like western social media has done?
Sorry there is a distinct disconnect here.
Q things are hard enough to find on the internet. And most that remain fall in category that is indeed misdirected.
Yet on this forum - there is a source and a discussion as well as possibly a channel.
All 3 can be confirmed, or refuted, and discussed.
I'm with you. Research is what we do.