"A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Yeah. The Democrats have proven that the Constitution means nothing to them. If they want to do something they will do it and spit on the Constitution at the same time. So Msrbury v. Madison means dick. If true then there would be no gun free cities
There is value in being able to point out that the democrats and their co-conspirators are clearly traitors and felons. Unambiguously, and having just re-sworn on the very same law that they are breaking.
Sometimes you can't TELL the public the truth. YOU MUST SHOW THEM. ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
Absolutely....and when the repubs take the law to the Supremes, they will surely uphold our gun rights.....the same way they upheld our right to expose election fraud.
Yeah. The Democrats have proven that the Constitution means nothing to them. If they want to do something they will do it and spit on the Constitution at the same time. So Msrbury v. Madison means dick. If true then there would be no gun free cities
There is value in being able to point out that the democrats and their co-conspirators are clearly traitors and felons. Unambiguously, and having just re-sworn on the very same law that they are breaking.
Absolutely....and when the repubs take the law to the Supremes, they will surely uphold our gun rights.....the same way they upheld our right to expose election fraud.
While this is true... so if fraudulently stealing an election is repugnantly against the constitution...