Are shut off every evening 11 pm. I verified this myself when I went to DC for the stop the steal march on Jan 6th. I walked almost 2 miles on the evening of the 5th just to see the White House, and I was very disappointed to realize the.lights were shut off all except for the flag. The same as they have been in the "10 days of darkness". I asked a SS agent why and he told me they are shut off at 11 every night. That was 15 days before Trump left office. You can verify this for yourself by watching the earthcam stream at about 10:58 pm EDT. The lights will be on up untill 11 pm. It is a residence; not a tourist attraction, and it doesnt need to be lit at all times, so it isn't. You can also make a phone call, it is pretty simple to verify this for yourself, and please do. DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT!!! This is a Q forum and people still arent doing the work to verify info before they spread it. Please do your due dilligence. The White House lights are not a secret signal, and I am sick of telling people that. Rant over Edit: I spoke to a uniformed USSS officer, not an agent. Link in commemts for details.
The White House lights
BREAKING NEWS
May I ask why we must block someone who may have done some research and may be providing us truth. For example, I'm doing research on "ha" in Trump's response to the articles of impeachment. X22 report has the "ha" highlighted in the word "that." I'm trying to see if the actual document had it highlighted or if this is just false hopium. I'm not trying to discredit anyone. I'm looking for the truth. You cannot find the truth if you discount everyone who is looking? Are you? Or are you taking everything at face value. That, to me, means that maybe you should be blocked or at least returned to Twitter where no one knows anything except what they are told.
Excellent
do what you want to do. that's it. if you don't like someone, block them. that's what we tell everyone else to do. follow your own advice. start with me, if you want. just block me.
It's not that I don't like you. I don't know you. I'm speaking in respect to the fact that when faced with an idea you do not like, you discount the person with that idea or that research. That is very dangerous. It is sometimes referred to as the blind-leading-the-blind. An example I can give is as author and an editor, I've seen authors who never, and I mean never use "passive" forms of verbs or even the word "that." When challenged, they have no idea why they do it. They've just been told not to use those words or forms of words. When you explain the exact rule to them and have them read a sentence that definitely requires a passive form or the word 'that," they sometimes wake up and realize the rules have specific purposes and should be used in those instances. Others will continue to tell me I'm wrong. I edit and I write for a living. I'm a word geek. That's the best (and probably lamest example I can give you for how misinformation works). I argue with authors with whom I edit for a publisher on a daily basis about these rules. They will stand beside their misconceptions because a critique partner (not an industry professional, but someone learning just as they are learning) to their own detriment, and I have to ask before I make the correction and discount their argument, "Do you think I'm telling you a lie to ruin your career and make the publisher look unprofessional? No. I'm trying to keep you from looking like an uneducated author and to keep our company viable in the industry. Misinformation taken as fact without regard from where it come can make someone look unknowledgeable and it can make a system appear unprofessional or, for lack of a better word, like a bunch of lunatics--which is how they wish to see us anyway. We're handing them ammunition. The person who posted gave us information he/she said they researched--personally. If true, then the cancellation of a lie can keep us all from looking stupid, but I suggest we also do was that person asked. Look for ourselves. He or she didn't ask someone who knew someone who knew someone's grandmother and tell you to take their word for it. They did their own research and asked you to follow up with your own. I prefer to regard someone who does that than to take someone at their word. We are asked to question everything. So why would someone questioning something and trying to find an answer mean they need to be deported from a group who is supposedly seeking answers?
I'll tell you what they tell people on 4chan. lurk moar. read more. see how the board works and see how people interact. getting mad at mods doesn't do anything but waste time, especially when you have the ability to block and deport people. learn all you can. try not to be too condescending about things (myself included). learn to discern the difference between time wasting trolls and people actually curious. if you ask a question that can be simply answered by looking through even just the top posts of hot, don't expect too much from people. in the way of help. if you're not a troll, I apologize.