Out of context quote. Several things wrong with your comment: 1) you don't actually know what the book consisted of when that was written, 2) should people not read any other book ever? 3) Should they never read any other book that talks about God? 4) should you not listen to anyone else when it comes to God - their words could be put in a book and therefore by your logic, they should not be read, and the larger implication is that you shouldn't listen to anyone who talks about God. 5) Christians aren't a unified group so how to you reconcile / adjudicate which one is correct? Some say Enoch should be in, some say Enoch and the Gnostic books should be in, some say they shouldn't. Who is right? How do you know?
Out of context quote. Several things wrong with your comment: 1) you don't actually know what the book consisted of when that was written, 2) should people not read any other book ever? 3) Should they never read any other book that talks about God? 4) should you not listen to anyone else when it comes to God - their words could be put in a book and therefore by your logic, they should not be read, and the larger implication is that you shouldn't listen to anyone who talks about God. 5) Christians aren't a unified group so how to you reconcile / adjudicate which one is correct? Some say Enoch should be in, some say Enoch and the Gnostic books should be in, some say they shouldn't. Who is right? How do you know?
You're wrong in every way. Prayers coming your way
Thanks for the declaration Michael Scott
Who are you to judge ones relationship with God?? You clearly have your own personal agenda(s).Wise up.
Projection at its finest