Had an annoying question on a video call today to which I answered, "I'm going to have to circle back on that"... one guy smiled, nice to know I'm secretly amongst frens at work - The Great Awakening

Had an annoying question on a video call today to which I answered, "I'm going to have to circle back on that"... one guy smiled, nice to know I'm secretly amongst frens at work (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by naahbruh 3 years ago by naahbruh +623 / -0

22 comments download

22 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (22)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– huntfishpede 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I used to like using that saying at the end of the day to deal with things in the morning.... now I feel like I can never say it again!

permalink save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– spoonix 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

You can try "loop around" instead, maybe?

Or can go back to the 2000's and bring "huddle up" back. But I'm not sure if that's a microaggression now or not. :(

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– huntfishpede 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

With frens I am going to keep using "circle back" just from a point of humor. I am not a sporty person so "huddle up" would not be me, but why would it be a microagression?? Everything is getting ruined, I know, but still.... and I will have to try "loop around" and see how it feels, thank you for the idea!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Ogcarvattack 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"Check the trap lines"

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q