"The fact that this has been known for years but even you haven't heard about it - having an academic background in cosmology should be proof enough for you that it's been covered up, a quick google of 'axis of evil' turning up nothing is further confirmation. The cabal is hiding this... wonder why?"
Who said I haven't heard of it? I learned about it a long time ago. This is not being hidden by the Cabal in academia. It is not talked about as "proof" of anything because there is simply not enough information to come to a meaningful conclusion. As I said, our models of cosmology are changing all the time.
"It proves that the isotropic theories of a random beginning are false, yes."
Isotropic theories of the origin of the universe have not been seriously entertained in physics for almost 100 years.
"The most likely conclusion (by Occam's razor) is that you want there to be some made-up 'preferential spin to the universe' - I hate to be mean but that's a ridiculous idea. Solar systems are fairly Randomly orientated throughout the universe."
No, there obviously IS a preferential spin to the universe. This has been known for several decades, before the CMB thing. We do not know why. It is a great mystery. Our solar system apparently (but not proven sufficiently) having an alignment with the universe as a whole while interesting, is not proof of anything. Again, the MOST LIKELY explanation is that the SAME FORCE that aligned the universe aligned our solar system with it. The only way to know if that is MEANINGFUL statistically speaking is to measure all the other solar systems and see if our alignment is special. To the best of my knowledge that is currently an impossible experiment to conduct (technologically speaking).
Of interest, I think the Milky Way is aligned almost exactly perpendicular to the same plane, which is even more evidence that it is some force that is causing a preferential alignment.
"Big Bang cosmology is a gold standard in science, and CMB with it."
I'm sorry man, nothing could be further from the truth, or at least, nothing could be more misleading from the truth. The Big Bang model of universal origin is actually MANY models starting from the same axiom (point like spread of spacetime). The debate of cosmological expansion, and which Big Bang model we should use (IF ANY) is huge and heated. It has been debated for 100 years, and likely will be debated for many more.
"Sorry for being tough on you"
Not a problem! Debate is healthy. Different ideas help us mere humans get closer to the truth of things. This is the way.
"The fact that this has been known for years but even you haven't heard about it - having an academic background in cosmology should be proof enough for you that it's been covered up, a quick google of 'axis of evil' turning up nothing is further confirmation. The cabal is hiding this... wonder why?"
Who said I haven't heard of it? I learned about it a long time ago. This is not being hidden by the Cabal in academia. It is not talked about as "proof" of anything because there is simply not enough information to come to a meaningful conclusion. As I said, our models of cosmology are changing all the time.
"It proves that the isotropic theories of a random beginning are false, yes."
Isotropic theories of the origin of the universe have not been seriously entertained in physics for almost 100 years.
"The most likely conclusion (by Occam's razor) is that you want there to be some made-up 'preferential spin to the universe' - I hate to be mean but that's a ridiculous idea. Solar systems are fairly Randomly orientated throughout the universe."
No, there obviously IS a preferential spin to the universe. This has been known for several decades, before the CMB thing. We do not know why. It is a great mystery. Our solar system apparently (but not proven sufficiently) having an alignment with the universe as a whole while interesting, is not proof of anything. Again, the MOST LIKELY explanation is that the SAME FORCE that aligned the universe aligned our solar system with it. The only way to know if that is MEANINGFUL statistically speaking is to measure all the other solar systems and see if our alignment is special. To the best of my knowledge that is currently an impossible experiment to conduct (technologically speaking).
Of interest, I think the Milky Way is aligned almost exactly perpendicular to the same plane, which is even more evidence that it is some force that is causing a preferential alignment.
"Big Bang cosmology is a gold standard in science, and CMB with it."
I'm sorry man, nothing could be further from the truth, or at least, nothing could be more misleading from the truth. The Big Bang model of universal origin is actually MANY models starting from the same axiom (point like spread of spacetime). The debate of cosmological expansion, and which Big Bang model we should use (IF ANY) is huge and heated. It has been debated for 100 years, and likely will be debated for many more.
"Sorry for being tough on you"
Not a problem! Debate is healthy. Different ideas help us mere humans get closer to the truth of things. This is the way.