Maybe. But you have given me NO INFORMATION of how there was a disconnect. If you think I've spoken with incoherence, address it specifically, because I don't think that's true. I suspect you have a different purpose, and you are masking it with a false claim of "incoherence".
You asked me to give you a more succinct argument. I complied.
You asked me to do that again without addressing what was wrong with what I had said except that it was "too long."
But in the second case, it clearly wasn't too long (less than one minute to read, maybe 30 seconds). You claimed it was a "wall of text." Yet it clearly wasn't a "wall of text" AKA an incoherence in readability, usually caused by poor formatting, coupled with poor grammar and sentence structure.
That is a completely different issue than succinctness (you have crafted a categorical error in your protest). Succinctness is itself a personal assessment, not a well defined outlay of information. Indeed, succinctness can easily make something less coherent while making it more succinct (despite having all the requisite information).
In this case I feel your requirement was taking away too much information, and I suspect it was designed to make a different argument to fit your agenda (whether you are aware of it or not).
I stated those things, and, like everything else I've said, you ignored my points, addressing not a SINGLE THING.
So what is your purpose here? It clearly isn't to think about what I've said. It clearly isn't even to find the point of contention. So why?
Again, you are proving that you don't actually want to hear what the actual contents of the argument are, no matter what they are. You only wanted to profess your holier-than-thouness.
Thanks for the confirmation.
to succinctly state
I ALREADY HAD DONE THAT.
You wanted it more succinct, ignoring the argument again, despite having already complied with your request.
Maybe my argument was more complicated than you think it was.
Maybe trying to make it less complete made it fundamentally less than it was, and thus, not the actual argument.
Maybe you were trying to dumb it down so that you could make a counterargument that fit your agenda, because the argument I made was too good at proving your ideas false.
I'm not saying that's what happened, because I don't know your intentions. But it seems that way to me.
a wall of text
A "wall of text" is a poorly formatted, or non-existent formatting; a literal "wall of text" which makes it's intent illegible. That is not what I have written in any case. What I did do was explain myself properly.
Yes, it was about fifteen very short sentences (in the previous case), put into proper paragraphs (divisions of intent), and perfectly readable. What it wasn't was a tweet (or if you prefer (as I do) a Twat). If you can't spend the time listening to my less than one minute of text, seriously, any response you have isn't worth my time. It clearly isn't worth yours.
As to your request, no. I can't reasonably make my intensions more succinct than I already have. I mean, I probably can with a bit of effort, but if you can't pay attention to a few well formatted sentences, you aren't giving my engagement in the conversation the effort it deserves. So neither will I.
Learn to listen. Let go of the Twat culture that demands a gnat level of attention or it's "a wall of text." (Which by the way, is a psyop, an intentional social programming.)
- Data centers is about collecting more and more data
That's too simple because that's not all it does. In fact it doesn't really do that at all. It's at best a small piece of a MUCH bigger pie.
The collection of data is one thing. That is not what a data center is for. That's the FIRST step perhaps, but it's the first of several. A data center is about processing data primarily, and using that processing power for usable effect. "Processing" requires a purpose or it is without purpose. I assert there are NO purposes that are helpful ON THE SCOPE OF DATA CENTERS.
By putting my point into the tiny part of the larger scope you miss it entirely.
- The only purpose of that level of data is total control.
I wouldn't say it exactly that way, but I think at the end, perhaps, because of the scope, yes. Evil (i.e. against the good of We The People) and ultimately for "control" is the only possible reason for that.
Any worthwhile venture that can even be conceivably within the purview of data processing in general, AT THAT LEVEL is not required for anything good.
It can be shown to be used for great evil however.
I think my nuclear weapon analogy was a good one. Nuclear power can be used for good. Nuclear weapons can only be created for evil. There is simply no reason to ever have one. The concept of "deterrence" is false, and can be shown to false on numerous levels (including, but not limited to, the one I showed in the previous post).
I'm not sure of your intention here, but it sounds to me like you are making a generalization argument (faulty logic). If you didn't mean what it sounds like to me, I apologize in advance.
There is nothing wrong with "progressing" or using data analysis for "progress," productivity, or learning. On the contrary, I spent decades of my life in data analysis in multiple capacities to great effect. It's kinda been central to my whole life. Indeed, I've been called "truly gifted" in that capacity; finding patterns in data, and writing programs to amplify it (signal from noise). Not that that means anything really, especially without details, but it shows how important it has been to me.
But that doesn't mean that that suite of tools (including AI (LDMs), which I played a small part of developing) can't be used for evil. And as far as I can find, the whole concept of "Big Data" (or operationally, "data centers") has no reason for existing. At least on the level it is already being employed, and especially in the capacity it is currently intended (by their own admission and as shown in Trump's post).
It's like the difference between nuclear power and nuclear bombs. Nuclear power makes a ton of sense. Nuclear bombs have zero good purpose. People used to believe that nukes were required, because the "enemy" had them, or were working on them. I used to believe that. Some people still do.
But when you investigate; really dig in, it turns out that the "American" nuclear bomb capacity was 100% created by Rockefeller (his family, and associated Cabal crones). From the first step in it's conception, to It's dropping in Japan (whether it was a psyop or real), to "the Cold War" and to today (presumably excluding since Q), it was 100% controlled by Rockefeller. It was promoted (propagandized) as if it were "a show of strength." But strength against who? Who was the enemy?
Was it the Nazis? But I can show that the Nazis were 100% an effort of Rockefeller and Rothschild (et al). I can show that the Nazi's nuclear program was controlled by those same entities.
Was the enemy the "Soviets?" But I can show that the Soviets were 100% an effort of Rockefeller and Rothschild (et al). I can show that their nuclear program was controlled by those same entities.
The same methods and entities involved were the same in every case, from the US to the Nazis to the USSR to Iran to the NK, etc. The exact same group used the exact same playbook every time. So who exactly is the "enemy?"
The enemy was (from their perspective) We The People. Obviously.
So what is the purpose of Big Data, which is intended to control Big Health, and Big Defense, and Big Information, and wide spread adoption of VR (to the expense of real Reality), and Big Economy, etc.?
What is the purpose for that level of "progressing" data?
A tool is just a tool. Nuclear power was a great tool. It still is. But nuclear bombs, the "logical next step" are literally useless for a good purpose, and a fantastic tool for evil purposes. I suggest that data processing, on that level, for AI, is similarly evil. Because there is NO ONE who is good who benefits from it in the slightest.
The Cabal on the other hand, Win with it.
Completely.
The Matrix is now complete.
I think it's quite possible that the completion of these data centers is the "scare" event Q talked about.
Data centers are pretty much the anti-Christ.
Note:
- They destroy the environment on a massive level
- They destroy people's property and surrounding property
- They control water, and water storage systems, with a priority of data centers over people (added from u/konadog below).
- While I think "global warming" is bunk as propagandized, data centers increase temperatures markedly in the local environment; and "local" is a pretty broad term here. If you want to kill the world, pollute it with that level of produced heat. (See quote below.**)
- They destroy "work", i.e. the actual economy; you know, actual people working and being productive, giving them fulfilling lives.
- They output data, which is not useful for ACTUAL PEOPLE (at large) but massively useful for the controllers of the world (The Shadow).
- That data is purposefully designed to control people's souls. Pushing MORE data is a BIGGER PUSH to dominate the soul of every individual on the planet.
Thus, "Data Centers" are quite literally, the Anti-Christ.
** Data centers convert nearly 100% of their electrical energy consumption into waste heat, with large facilities generating 20 to 50 MW of heat and massive campuses producing up to 300 MW—enough to heat hundreds of thousands of homes. This concentrated thermal output creates localized "data center heat islands," where recent studies show land surface temperatures can rise by an average of 3.6°F (2°C) and up to 16.4°F (9.1°C) in extreme cases within a 6-mile (10 km) radius.
I consider ALL sources to be primary sources. I.e., i look at who actually wrote what. I investigate the context in which things were said. I assume nothing. I listen to everyone.
So what sources are YOU assuming, why are you assuming them, and who benefited from them? What are the controversies surrounding them? What is the context and/or has the context been altered to give a different meaning than intended? What do the controversies have to say in their own original context? Listen, really listen.
Assume nothing. Trust in nothing, including myself. Listen to everyone. EVERYONE is a primary source in some context.
If that is true, then Yeshua was false.
This is a false statement (not logical).
Look at why you believe those to be directly tied statements (proper supersets of each other), i.e. that one must necessarily (exclusively) follow the other. Look at the actual sources that support it. Where it came from, the controversies surrounding it, who paid for the resulting war to resolve those controversies, and who benefitted from it.
It's really called "The Cabal End Game." This "transition" was a part of a plan put in over a century before, ending in the destruction of the US (or at least in the middle of the End).
Nothing is organic. None of this was a "choice." It has always been a plan.
It's STILL a plan. In fact, it's THE SAME PLAN. Q tweaked it a bit, re-wrote the ending. Added a "twist." But it's still the same plan, they just hired a new Director. (Monty Python v. Spielberg).
for letting it get this bad in the first place
That's not really fair. People had zero choice in the matter. It has been a psyop for a few thousand years. The same psyop (with some minor caveats). The Truth has been purposefully hidden by the same entity, using the same methods, controlled by the same group of people, the whole time. That Truth is now being revealed, for the first time since around the end of the Bronze Age.
Even then, it was a different (albeit related) psyop controlled by a different (albeit literally related) group controlling that previous version of The Matrix. (We'll call it Matrix ver. 1.0. We are in version 2.0 which has been going on for around 2.5 to 3 thousand years.)
Once they have access to our 'toys'
The idea that they don't now, or haven't had them from the beginning is a fiction. The same people who created the state of Israel is the exact same people that created all our "toys."
What is happening is a disclosure of that truth. It isn't actually changing the control systems ("ownership") of anything.
The Cabal System of control still exists. Q et al cut off the head of that snake and put themselves at the top to expose that system, using the system to destroy it from the inside.
THAT is what is actually going on. Everything else is just a part of The Show.
Once it is done it cannot be undone, not even by law
That is a statement that doesn't make a lick of sense. "Law" (not counting the Natural Laws) is a false limit. It doesn't actually exist. It can't influence reality in the slightest. PEOPLE can influence reality. PEOPLE can make other people believe in their false limits (a fiction). PEOPLE do those things. And ONLY PEOPLE can undo them. All they have to do is say, "Fuck No!"
The "Fuck" isn't strictly required, but sometimes it's is the only proper response.
well out live their best by or exp date
Pretty much anything sold in a jar or (especially) a can will outlive the person who buys it.
Probably down to the 10th generation (or even longer) in many cases.
Scam to mass produce products and keep stock moving in, and out.
Yes, the "exp date" is a full on scam; a part of the System designed to keep people buying things they don't need (as is most everything else in our carefully crafted consumer culture).
It's basically impossible.
In the mid aughts (2004+), I was part of a team who created an "expert system" (the precursor for current AI) to diagnose heart disease. Such a medical issue such as arterial blockage was trivial to test. Our system used only three or five leads (depending on if there were suspicions), and no jell or messy residue. It took two minutes or less to put on the leads, took seconds for the AI to put out the info and a minute for the doctor to proclaim the diagnosis (five minutes total for the entire test).
Such an issue (heart attack from arterial blockage) might occur for someone who has never had a doctor's visit in the prior ten years, but for a senator, who is tested all the time (at least once a year), it stretches credulity beyond breaking.
Heart attacks don't "just happen." At least not anymore, not for someone in power. It is trivial to know if someone is susceptible to a heart attack. It is trivial to know if an "artery is blocked" long before it becomes a problem and thus solved. It is trivial (for someone in the know) to unblock an artery and prevent it from becoming problematic.
There are three scenarios that I think are probable:
- He died of a heart attack, but that heart attack was intentional (an assassination).
- He died of natural causes.
- He is still alive.
Based on the total amount of information I have available, based on my investigations, "2" (natural causes) is the least likely case.
His death advances the narrative and has huge implications.
Nothing can stop what is coming.
"2" is very unlikely.
$1.5M of coke? That's a Saturday night in a moderate sized party in some circles. This is nothing. This must connect to something much bigger for this to matter. For example, if it were connected to $100k of pizza and hotdogs, that would be a big deal.
the source of all that is good and true
The Source is the Source of ALL Things. There is only ONE Source, and literally everything is derivative of that Source. If you think otherwise, someone sold you something, and you bought it. Many people believe that there is a "way to God", as if it is an effort towards a specific destination ("There's only one possible path, and we have told you what it is." e.g.). That is mostly false, at least as we understand it (as dogma). God (or Source, or "Heaven," etc.) is INSIDE YOU ALREADY. And It is already inside of Everyone Else as well.
That was the Primary teaching of Yeshua. (The name "Jesus" never existed. It was contrived in the 17th century to help further push the lie of separation.) There is no separation. There is no "path" we must traverse, as if it were an external destination, or "towards" someone or something else. We have simply been brainwashed to forget who we are.
For someone who hates a particular people
I hate exactly zero people. I am simply telling you what happened. There are no judgements here.
come full circle to God is also the enemy
There are two different things.
-
One is an entity (either real or imagined is irrelevant for this purpose) that calls itself "God," along with a group of people (the "Priests") that push their specific ideology and dogmatic system, as a control mechanism and eugenics program ("Chosen people").
-
One is The Source of All Things.
If you convince people that one is the Other, you create confusion. If you keep pushing the conflation, over centuries and after a few genocides, eventually a false dogma; a "separation," keeps everyone from seeing the Truth.
I still don’t understand how rich American Jews are vaxing their kids
All but the very tippy top of the food chain are just as brainwashed as everyone else. Well, even at the top that is true, it's just that they have different brainwashing programs for different Legacy's.
That is true for both Jew and non-Jew. Though those are intimately linked through the mother genetics (mtDNA).
I’d say 99+% of Jews are vaxed
I'd suggest that's about right. Almost all are ignorant/brainwashed. The difference between the the "1%" and the "0.00001%" is the difference between the Jews and the Arians (there is a lot of mixing there through the mothers). Jews have an advantage (substantial), but it's still a meritocracy. (I.e. the System is a Aristocracy, a Meritocracy, AND a Theocracy, depending how up you go.)
brainwashed Democrat
This isn't a "Democrat" thing. Yes, they have specific programming. On "the Right" (a contrived ideal), they have a different programming. It's called "Controlled Opposition." Left and Right are both controlled by the same entity, and always have been.
The population is self-sacrificing and begging for it.
Prior to 2020, everyone was on the same page regarding "we have a population problem." It wasn't until people started actually looking that people started to realize (on "both" sides) that we are already in decline, and had been for 50 years. And it had been pushed for more than a century.
There are several versions of the vax.
There are several versions of "their own kind."
They even call them, "our lesser brethren."
They have no problem sacrificing "their own." It's called a targeted and selective halocaust, which means, burnt sacrifice.
A sacrifice is meaningless unless it hurts the person offering the sacrifice.
They have been offering burnt sacrifices for a very, very long time.
That never changed.
The amount of evidence that the Jews were the people who created the Nazi's is overwhelming.
While there were quite a few Jews killed in WWII (preferentially murdered based on asset value, by the laws at the time or targeted attacks), it was not "6 million Jews" (not even close), and the amount of evidence that not a single person was killed by a combination gas chamber/2000 degree oven is absolutely undeniable.
The way the world is controlled is by category errors and/or generalization errors. Everyone assumes they know "what the sides are," and "what each side wants."
Once you start digging deep into those beliefs, and recognize that we are supposed to believe in those beliefs, and the congruence of their categories (both real and contrived), and that those beliefs are exploited (in every way possible), everything starts to make sense.
Goyim (aka cattle) is anyone who doesn't have the seed of Israel (I.e. genetic male blood line; the literal seed (proven by Y-DNA testing), passed down from father to son ad infinitum). Only those of that seed are of the elect (have the Divine Spark aka have a soul). That has been the primary dogma of the Israeli religion (that we currently call Judaism) for at least 3000 years.
It has not changed one iota.
This is a spiritual war. The god of Abraham (Israel) is not your friend.
But they did make everyone believe that their god was the same entity as the Source of All Things. They did it because it was beneficial for them.
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he was the good guy.
I need to check my statements (especially about the "made in china" thing). I might be mixing up a couple of different statements, merging them together. It's only a meme if it's exactly right.
It is close though. And the legal statements are exactly what happened. Maybe I can try to check my sources tomorrow.
Bernie Sanders rolls over against Hitlery in 2016. Then he get's a "book deal" and other benefits of his compliance.
Bernie Sanders' real wealth is discovered (gets stock advice of his millions from Larry Fink)