If it gives you any hope, my friend was getting impatient that I still haven't given up on Q (been here since early 2018 so I don't think I can just give up lol, this isn't our first rodeo or "10 days of darkness")
He asked, "what specific date will you finally disavow?" that's when I said "I don't know, I can't give you a date, but I can say that I will stop believing when it is clear that nothing is happening." He brought up how nothing is happening and I corrected that only the news isn't reporting on what is happening.
I showed him the bulk of what we gathered here after inauguration day like Joe Biden's and others' weird movements and comments as if being escorted by police, the military in DC, the 21 gun salute, etc. He said "maybe you have a point, that all is weird" (good enough for me).
This was right before "10 days darkness" ended at the white house just as Myanmar military takes control.
I try to show him what I can about Q but I basically summarized it as "look all of these anons and I did not just stumble across a guy on the chans saying 'I'm a totally legit government insider and Hillary will be arrested' and outright go 'You son of a bitch, I'm in' because many of us had seen that before, (hey guys I'm a space alien doing a school project on Earthlings, AMA). We met it with necessary skepticism and over the course of 3 years have been unable to deny it's legitimacy within the Executive Branch, despite constant and sustained media attacks, getting banned from everywhere on Reddit for "ban evasion" (meaningless term now), and even family cutting us out and blaming us for it (whether or not we actually talk about Q to them or if they just watched MSNBC and got freaked out). I will show you the proofs if you want to take the time to go over every single one, but you can trust me that after reading every post for years that it is undeniable."
If I'm honest, I'm new here, and I haven't yet decided what Q is. What I have decided is that it is definitely something, and whatever that something is, it's not what the media want us to believe. Even without being bought into Q, no-one who has looked at the events of the last 6 months objectively can say that there aren't things that need explanation - there is NO DOUBT that some kind of Psyop has been run around the election, it is not yet 100% clear to me what the nature of the operation was, who was running it, or what Trump's involvement with it was, and because I'm unclear on that, I'm wary of what I communicate and who I communicate it to. Because I don't want to discredit myself or anything else by assuming an unwarranted certainty.
But what I can and do say to anyone who will listen is that an incredibly sophisticated Psyop has been run in the US over the last year or so, and to take anything that the media is saying at face value is just not wise. It has not yet been demonstrated what is to be trusted but something very significant is going on around Trump that most people are not seeing because they have been conditioned not to look for it. Again, I can't be certain what it is, but there's something there that warrants careful attention.
I think its good to be straight in our own minds about what we are absolutely CERTAIN of, and what we would like to be true, or think could be true, and just be very clear about that when communicating. The only way to convince anyone about anything is to first create in them the desire to actually know whatever it is that there is to know... Many people are not yet at that stage, and the wrong kind of certainty from someone who has already passed through that stage themselves can actually hinder that process... Just asking open ended questions can help I think - so long as you really want to listen to the answer... For example, what do you think of the media? What issues bother you about the media etc etc.
How did you explain to them the failure of one of the first (and most dramatic) Q predictions - HRC arrest Oct 30, 2017? That one event alone drives most people I know away.
from what I remember, his next post said that she was "detained, not arrested (yet)" and that was when she started wearing the boot, along with John M who couldn't decide which ankle was broken.
I believe them wearing the boot is what gave Q their first piece of credibility among anons
If it gives you any hope, my friend was getting impatient that I still haven't given up on Q (been here since early 2018 so I don't think I can just give up lol, this isn't our first rodeo or "10 days of darkness")
He asked, "what specific date will you finally disavow?" that's when I said "I don't know, I can't give you a date, but I can say that I will stop believing when it is clear that nothing is happening." He brought up how nothing is happening and I corrected that only the news isn't reporting on what is happening.
I showed him the bulk of what we gathered here after inauguration day like Joe Biden's and others' weird movements and comments as if being escorted by police, the military in DC, the 21 gun salute, etc. He said "maybe you have a point, that all is weird" (good enough for me).
This was right before "10 days darkness" ended at the white house just as Myanmar military takes control.
I try to show him what I can about Q but I basically summarized it as "look all of these anons and I did not just stumble across a guy on the chans saying 'I'm a totally legit government insider and Hillary will be arrested' and outright go 'You son of a bitch, I'm in' because many of us had seen that before, (hey guys I'm a space alien doing a school project on Earthlings, AMA). We met it with necessary skepticism and over the course of 3 years have been unable to deny it's legitimacy within the Executive Branch, despite constant and sustained media attacks, getting banned from everywhere on Reddit for "ban evasion" (meaningless term now), and even family cutting us out and blaming us for it (whether or not we actually talk about Q to them or if they just watched MSNBC and got freaked out). I will show you the proofs if you want to take the time to go over every single one, but you can trust me that after reading every post for years that it is undeniable."
If I'm honest, I'm new here, and I haven't yet decided what Q is. What I have decided is that it is definitely something, and whatever that something is, it's not what the media want us to believe. Even without being bought into Q, no-one who has looked at the events of the last 6 months objectively can say that there aren't things that need explanation - there is NO DOUBT that some kind of Psyop has been run around the election, it is not yet 100% clear to me what the nature of the operation was, who was running it, or what Trump's involvement with it was, and because I'm unclear on that, I'm wary of what I communicate and who I communicate it to. Because I don't want to discredit myself or anything else by assuming an unwarranted certainty.
But what I can and do say to anyone who will listen is that an incredibly sophisticated Psyop has been run in the US over the last year or so, and to take anything that the media is saying at face value is just not wise. It has not yet been demonstrated what is to be trusted but something very significant is going on around Trump that most people are not seeing because they have been conditioned not to look for it. Again, I can't be certain what it is, but there's something there that warrants careful attention.
I think its good to be straight in our own minds about what we are absolutely CERTAIN of, and what we would like to be true, or think could be true, and just be very clear about that when communicating. The only way to convince anyone about anything is to first create in them the desire to actually know whatever it is that there is to know... Many people are not yet at that stage, and the wrong kind of certainty from someone who has already passed through that stage themselves can actually hinder that process... Just asking open ended questions can help I think - so long as you really want to listen to the answer... For example, what do you think of the media? What issues bother you about the media etc etc.
How did you explain to them the failure of one of the first (and most dramatic) Q predictions - HRC arrest Oct 30, 2017? That one event alone drives most people I know away.
from what I remember, his next post said that she was "detained, not arrested (yet)" and that was when she started wearing the boot, along with John M who couldn't decide which ankle was broken.
I believe them wearing the boot is what gave Q their first piece of credibility among anons
Are you suggesting she's been in detention ever since, and has always worn some sort of ankle device? To what end?