The problem with pointing to Q is that there's so much stuff that is hard to swallow. Eg -Oct 30 2017; HRC. How do you rationalize that to someone who's questioning Q? And I personally think spinning the whole baby eating/adrenochrome angle is a terrible put-off for people. Why not just focus on the fact that HRC is a crazy bitch, a swamp dweller, etc - why try to suggest she murders babies? People see that stuff and run a mile.
There was no mention of baby eating, satanic cult rituals, adrenochrome, etc. Just because I brought up Q drops and showed QProofs doesn't mean I dropped a shitload of adrenochrome on him.. lol
The problem with pointing to Q is that there's so much stuff that is hard to swallow. Eg -Oct 30 2017; HRC. How do you rationalize that to someone who's questioning Q? And I personally think spinning the whole baby eating/adrenochrome angle is a terrible put-off for people. Why not just focus on the fact that HRC is a crazy bitch, a swamp dweller, etc - why try to suggest she murders babies? People see that stuff and run a mile.
There was no mention of baby eating, satanic cult rituals, adrenochrome, etc. Just because I brought up Q drops and showed QProofs doesn't mean I dropped a shitload of adrenochrome on him.. lol
Yeah, but as soon as you mention Q, people start searching, and that's what they find!