We perceive these events as “coincidences” because we do not have the absolute data on why these events intersected, that feeling of not knowing the variables at play is now called “coincidence”. There are none.
I've said this many times. Q is obviously referring to no coincidences in reference to his drops(mathematically impossible proofs). Not reality itself, which leads to people in this forum throwing shit at the walls to see what sticks. Half the time they don't even meet the criteria of a coincidence.
I know, but I mean there has to be some ..
We perceive these events as “coincidences” because we do not have the absolute data on why these events intersected, that feeling of not knowing the variables at play is now called “coincidence”. There are none.
True, but with this, the phrase doesn't even apply to the exercise. I'm going full hopim with this one.
I’m at about half hopium for this one
I've said this many times. Q is obviously referring to no coincidences in reference to his drops(mathematically impossible proofs). Not reality itself, which leads to people in this forum throwing shit at the walls to see what sticks. Half the time they don't even meet the criteria of a coincidence.