yup. there are monogamous and non-evil gays, but it's useful for the same reasons as the transgenders - and to discredit judaism and christianity.
In Leviticus, it is written that sodomites go to hell. consider that monogamous gays didn't exist - they were all sex fiends and/or cheating on spouses - so that verse is right for the cultural context.
infiltrate the churches and synagogues - 'that applies to sodomites today, and means gays are evil', >> society sees the hypocrisy and flawed theology for what it is. gays have always had it worse than non-gays in society, they're probably a fuck up either of your gods work or evolution (done by lucifer or mutation).
Denying christians the compassion to understand and help them is a boon, gays would be some of the most righteous and holy otherwise - instead they rebel against christianity and are purposefully sinful.
Actually, no -- Leviticus condemns the action of male homosexual behavior. A homosexual, if by that definition you mean someone with the inclination -- is only sinning if he acts on that urge. The idea that someone is randomly and permanently committed to one brand of sexual preference is actually a very recent one. (And probably not even true; I think the mythology has been useful to the LGBT lobby politically, especially to piggy back on the civil rights won by blacks. It benefited LGBT activists to pretend sexuality is as inborn and unalterable as skin color. Truth takes a back seat).
As for "worse" in society... well, by your values, gays would have it better, wouldn't they? Think of the perks: Unlimited sex without a reproductive capacity. The joy of orgasm, more readily given because men do not fear getting pregnant, so they don't have the motivation to not engage that women always had. (Who wants to get impregnated from a one night stand?). Also, men engaged exclusively in homosexuality generally don't have offspring, another victory for the anti-human ideals of your philosophy.
After all, what does the heterosexual couple get? Well, children. They stress, the heartache, the financial commitment, the sleepless nights. Wouldn't Satanism prefer to forgo that and live for the orgasms available at any night club?
Makes me wonder why anyone with that ideology would want to have children. Though it sounded, in your case, your father did it as a sort of status symbol. Is that accurate?
yup. there are monogamous and non-evil gays, but it's useful for the same reasons as the transgenders - and to discredit judaism and christianity.
In Leviticus, it is written that sodomites go to hell. consider that monogamous gays didn't exist - they were all sex fiends and/or cheating on spouses - so that verse is right for the cultural context.
infiltrate the churches and synagogues - 'that applies to sodomites today, and means gays are evil', >> society sees the hypocrisy and flawed theology for what it is. gays have always had it worse than non-gays in society, they're probably a fuck up either of your gods work or evolution (done by lucifer or mutation).
Denying christians the compassion to understand and help them is a boon, gays would be some of the most righteous and holy otherwise - instead they rebel against christianity and are purposefully sinful.
Actually, no -- Leviticus condemns the action of male homosexual behavior. A homosexual, if by that definition you mean someone with the inclination -- is only sinning if he acts on that urge. The idea that someone is randomly and permanently committed to one brand of sexual preference is actually a very recent one. (And probably not even true; I think the mythology has been useful to the LGBT lobby politically, especially to piggy back on the civil rights won by blacks. It benefited LGBT activists to pretend sexuality is as inborn and unalterable as skin color. Truth takes a back seat).
As for "worse" in society... well, by your values, gays would have it better, wouldn't they? Think of the perks: Unlimited sex without a reproductive capacity. The joy of orgasm, more readily given because men do not fear getting pregnant, so they don't have the motivation to not engage that women always had. (Who wants to get impregnated from a one night stand?). Also, men engaged exclusively in homosexuality generally don't have offspring, another victory for the anti-human ideals of your philosophy.
After all, what does the heterosexual couple get? Well, children. They stress, the heartache, the financial commitment, the sleepless nights. Wouldn't Satanism prefer to forgo that and live for the orgasms available at any night club?
Makes me wonder why anyone with that ideology would want to have children. Though it sounded, in your case, your father did it as a sort of status symbol. Is that accurate?