Maybe this has been said before, if so, I'll delete my post.
A few weeks ago, Mike Lindell came out of the WH holding a document on which was written: Martial Law, Insurrection Act, put Kash Patel as Acting CIA director, etc. It was clearly staged. But suddenly, everyone started talking about it. Even newspapers here in France ran articles on this. They made fun of Mike Lindell, etc. But, the result is: everyone knows who Mike Lindell is.
Now, a few days ago, he goes on a show - where he was probably told not to speak about Dominion - and he did. Again, every newspaper cheers and writes articles about how conspiracy theorist, Mike Lindell, pillow merchant, was silenced, and how the host walked off. They're gleeful and happy. Result: people hear about him once again.
Now, today, he drops his video, with the bombshell news (for many out there) about foreign interference into the election. We all knew that, but seeing the documents by Mary Fanning and the graphs showing foreign interference was still pretty incredible. Mike Lindell repeats that this is an act of war over and over again.
OANN puts a disclaimer to the video: this disclaimer have got people talking about the video, more people see it (even if they don't believe it). They could just be doing it because they don't have the means to respond to a billion dollar lawsuit. (At the same time, Flynn does an interview saying there's no plan but to hold the wine). Also, Time Magazine says the election was rigged (fortified) but still rigged.
So, what if this is some serious genius Trump strategising, prepping the public for what Mike Lindell has now shown: that this is an act of war, so that the military can step in?
The gist of my argument is therefore the following: Mike Lindell shows this is an act of war. Because it is so, the military must act as they cannot let other countries interfere in the elections. Therefore, once things get going (and my idea here is that it is going to be soon soon soon - this is why the video was released), the public knows why. If they still haven't woken up, they can still go back to the video and watch it.
What do you think?
I fully appreciate his 'rags to riches' story and tip my hat to him for that. Love those stories. But his commercials with that tacky, retro jingle, and the intentional 'homey' style, is just very reminiscent of late night / early morning commercials for stupid shit like the 'clapper' light switch, or the 'Chia pet things, or whatever (you know, you fall asleep watching TV and wake up at 3am and are suddenly watching utter crap commercials on TV ...). I'm just saying, he doesn't have the best credibility with those commercials, totally independent of whatever message he has now. EDIT - I see you are in France. I lived in UK for many years. Europe just doesn't have the same 'late night TV commercials' we have in the US ... we are quite unique in that regard!
Oh no, don't worry. We have commercials that are sneaked in during cartoon time to teach children how not to get close to their grandparents, or showing them how to do any of the woke things that are also trending here, and whatnot. I'd trade that for some late night jingle anytime. :) Anyway, I understand you don't like commercials, I loathe them.
UK TV Commercials used to be GOLDEN! Nothing like them! I'm an old fogie, and I remember awesome "PG Tips" commercials. Do a search for 'PG Tips' and 'monkeys' or, 'can you ride a tandem' ...