Mike is on WarRoom talking about his video. Threatened to sue Dominion! Wants he and them to go into a room, with media, to look at the evidence. They (Dominion) says he is lying, he says he has proof (information in the video).
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
I agree. There's a lot of loose, ambiguous terminology out there, some with historic origins that no longer apply or are relevant.
"on the internet" - these days, 'everything' is available on the 'internet', including 'broadcast TV', through packages like YouTube or HULU. My local 'ABC-7' 'TV' news channel has their own website where I can stream their live broadcasts, and read their stories more like a newspaper. Perhaps we say, 'exclusive to the internet' - that would allow for (eg) bitchute, but even that gets less clear when you think of YouTubeTV, which is now offering a package including live TV.
And what is a 'network' these days? It's an affiliation of local 'broadcast' stations, that features a news program combining some national elements with local elements.
"Cable News" is now available on corporate websites (cnn.com, foxnews.com, etc) but a lot of people still call it 'cable news' because at one point in time, that really meant, a channel exclusive to cable services.
And then you have people who produce their own news, which may be carried by YT or Bitchute, or just carried on its own website, but they've got a big enough 'brand' to be able to claim to be a 'channel'.
Anyway - my point is, it's hard to know where people are getting their information from these days. Obviously people on GAW are getting it from 'exclusive to the internet' sources, but when a person casually says, 'I get my news from the internet', it's not clear where that is.