I'm going more with the guy that's still there, knows the details, and isn't a disgruntled FORMER employee. Seems as though he is the one that wanted more censoring and was willing to go with a company to host their platform, but that company had CONDITIONS. He wanted to go with that company but the others didn't - they want free speech, that company didn't. I'm thinking he was trying to back-door the Parler into a left-leaning agenda.
I'm going to go with the Gab CEO who painted Parler's leadership as making a deal with the devil on support. Whether Matze is a good guy or a bad guy, Parler's leadership are bad guys.
Well, Gab CEO is all behind Matze, spewing VERY different information than what Bongino said, who is another owner with first-hand knowledge of the meetings. So, I'm going with Bongino.
I'm going more with the guy that's still there, knows the details, and isn't a disgruntled FORMER employee. Seems as though he is the one that wanted more censoring and was willing to go with a company to host their platform, but that company had CONDITIONS. He wanted to go with that company but the others didn't - they want free speech, that company didn't. I'm thinking he was trying to back-door the Parler into a left-leaning agenda.
I'm going to go with the Gab CEO who painted Parler's leadership as making a deal with the devil on support. Whether Matze is a good guy or a bad guy, Parler's leadership are bad guys.
Well, Gab CEO is all behind Matze, spewing VERY different information than what Bongino said, who is another owner with first-hand knowledge of the meetings. So, I'm going with Bongino.