Deem is nothing, always has been. What is the burden of proof to deem something? Zero. What is the minimal degree of expertise or familiarity with the subject before someone can deem something pertaining to the subject? Zero.
It means an uninformed opinion by one random person apropos nothing. Why is something so insignificant elevated to such importance that huge consequences pivot around it? Because its criminal and fraudulent and moneyed crime interests are all about promoting and propagating fraud.
In a courtcase, if someone deaf and blind and far removed from the crime scene took the stand to give expert testimony on a field they were illiterate in, would that be worth anything? No. The mere act is a fraud on the court.
Deem is nothing, always has been. What is the burden of proof to deem something? Zero. What is the minimal degree of expertise or familiarity with the subject before someone can deem something pertaining to the subject? Zero.
It means an uninformed opinion by one random person apropos nothing. Why is something so insignificant elevated to such importance that huge consequences pivot around it? Because its criminal and fraudulent and moneyed crime interests are all about promoting and propagating fraud.
In a courtcase, if someone deaf and blind and far removed from the crime scene took the stand to give expert testimony on a field they were illiterate in, would that be worth anything? No. The mere act is a fraud on the court.