The chances of life are infinitesimal but space is nearly infinite. The chances of an alien finding us are infinitesimal compared to life and the chances an alien can travel here and also have compatible parts (never mind being able to breed as Simon purports) is vanishingly small even compared to that.
And before you discount the idea, spend some time reading the Old Testament, helps to do so in its original form and language, but even in English should be fine. Better yet, Sumerian texts, which Torah is simply an abridged version of with a more specific accent on Jewish roots. Ancient Hebrew is about 80% Sumerian, the only language today that is close.
Then research all recent scientific confirmations. DNA research confirmed, about 2 years ago?, that we all came from 6 mothers. First humans had no ability to procreate, right? "Adam and Eve were given long life, but no ability to procreate". Sumerian texts/tablets clearly describe 6 mothers and DNA altering experiments, CLONING, to create humans, via 6 mothers via in vitro impregnation. Took a few attempts. Then look at the depiction of a "snake". Again, bad translation from Torah. The word can mean a snake, sure, but another ancient Hebrew meaning for the word is, He who possesses knowledge. "Snake" then gives humans ability to procreate, right, apple or what not? Now, take a good look at depictions of a "snake" winding around a staff. What does it remind you of? Strands of DNA?
Now, research our own cloning experiments in recent times, and let me know what specific trait is in-built, and matches the above. No ability to procreate. We're still a step behind.
Then read Job's trip, he came back 800 years later in our years?, and his description of the Solar system, again, to a T, including Neptune, planet we didn't know existed until less than 100 years ago. Never even mind the rest of the planets, correct number, their proper placements and size, and colors.
Don't care what Parkes claims about alien sex, haven't heard him on the subject. But I study very ancient history, and the more recent medical/scientific research I follow/read the more it confirms Sumerian texts/tablets/Torah. To a T.
And, no, I am not religious, never was, and by my age now never will be. Instead of an atheist I am now an agnostic. But we, humans, didn't "just happen", no matter what anyone claims. We were deliberately created. The original test tube babies.
Its a long discussion. Not that I give credence to anything Parkes claims, I actually consider him a lying shill, but do not discount our origins as described in Sumerian/Torah texts.
Non-Hebrew versions of the Bible have a few very significant "misinterpretations" from the original Hebrew language text. Start with the very key difference (Genesis) between "eloh" and "elohIM", that in itself is way more than significant to alter everyone's perception of everything and all the beliefs. Mind blowing, really. Matches Sumerian texts, but not the Bible, of course. Like I said, a very long discussion.
Ok that is understandable. Does that mean he cannot have anything credible to say? Sort of like when Jesus confessed to be Son of GOD. Many found that hard to believe and blasphemous but i digress not trying to make you believe anyone. Hell i am not sure who to believe anymore
Belief was never my argument. My argument is: that Q's assertion of Alien life does not lend credence to Simon Parkes at all. His info should be taken on its own and not erroneously bolstered by referencing Q.
I feel you on the not sure who to believe. Life's a bitch that way.
No.
Consider the vastness of space.
The chances of life are infinitesimal but space is nearly infinite. The chances of an alien finding us are infinitesimal compared to life and the chances an alien can travel here and also have compatible parts (never mind being able to breed as Simon purports) is vanishingly small even compared to that.
Nephilim. They did breed with human women.
And before you discount the idea, spend some time reading the Old Testament, helps to do so in its original form and language, but even in English should be fine. Better yet, Sumerian texts, which Torah is simply an abridged version of with a more specific accent on Jewish roots. Ancient Hebrew is about 80% Sumerian, the only language today that is close.
Then research all recent scientific confirmations. DNA research confirmed, about 2 years ago?, that we all came from 6 mothers. First humans had no ability to procreate, right? "Adam and Eve were given long life, but no ability to procreate". Sumerian texts/tablets clearly describe 6 mothers and DNA altering experiments, CLONING, to create humans, via 6 mothers via in vitro impregnation. Took a few attempts. Then look at the depiction of a "snake". Again, bad translation from Torah. The word can mean a snake, sure, but another ancient Hebrew meaning for the word is, He who possesses knowledge. "Snake" then gives humans ability to procreate, right, apple or what not? Now, take a good look at depictions of a "snake" winding around a staff. What does it remind you of? Strands of DNA?
Now, research our own cloning experiments in recent times, and let me know what specific trait is in-built, and matches the above. No ability to procreate. We're still a step behind.
Then read Job's trip, he came back 800 years later in our years?, and his description of the Solar system, again, to a T, including Neptune, planet we didn't know existed until less than 100 years ago. Never even mind the rest of the planets, correct number, their proper placements and size, and colors.
Don't care what Parkes claims about alien sex, haven't heard him on the subject. But I study very ancient history, and the more recent medical/scientific research I follow/read the more it confirms Sumerian texts/tablets/Torah. To a T.
And, no, I am not religious, never was, and by my age now never will be. Instead of an atheist I am now an agnostic. But we, humans, didn't "just happen", no matter what anyone claims. We were deliberately created. The original test tube babies.
Its a long discussion. Not that I give credence to anything Parkes claims, I actually consider him a lying shill, but do not discount our origins as described in Sumerian/Torah texts.
Non-Hebrew versions of the Bible have a few very significant "misinterpretations" from the original Hebrew language text. Start with the very key difference (Genesis) between "eloh" and "elohIM", that in itself is way more than significant to alter everyone's perception of everything and all the beliefs. Mind blowing, really. Matches Sumerian texts, but not the Bible, of course. Like I said, a very long discussion.
Well i guess you dont believe the reports by the govt that we are already being visited ona regular basis
Never said that. I said Simon Parkes being the child of an alien and having semi-regular conjugal visits with one is what I find unbelievable
Ok that is understandable. Does that mean he cannot have anything credible to say? Sort of like when Jesus confessed to be Son of GOD. Many found that hard to believe and blasphemous but i digress not trying to make you believe anyone. Hell i am not sure who to believe anymore
Belief was never my argument. My argument is: that Q's assertion of Alien life does not lend credence to Simon Parkes at all. His info should be taken on its own and not erroneously bolstered by referencing Q.
I feel you on the not sure who to believe. Life's a bitch that way.
WWG1WGA, at least.