I’m not talking about British common law. I’m talking about this part of the US constitution.
Article I
Section 3
Clause 7
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law
I’m not talking about British common law. I’m talking about this part of the US constitution.
Article I
Section 3 Clause 7 Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-3/clause-7/
He has been removed from office already. The plainly stated condition is met. So, yes, it absolutely is contradictory to the plain text.