U S ARMY MAJOR GENERAL Paul E. Vallely talks Q and drops a hint to a NEW INTERNET - The Great Awakening

177

U S ARMY MAJOR GENERAL Paul E. Vallely talks Q and drops a hint to a NEW INTERNET (www.youtube.com) ?️ DISCUSSION ?

posted 3 years ago by Human1967 3 years ago by Human1967 +177 / -0

69 comments

69 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (69)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Judicator 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Point us towards your "proof" then. You can't just make a claim, not back it up, and expect people to go looking for the proof themselves.

The burden of proof is on the claimant.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– Judicator 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

In order to know the truth, one must first rigorously challenge it. Only against the weight of logical, emotional, and factual analysis can something hold true. I am not attacking you. I am not attacking your idea. I am attacking the message that you're promoting about believing you without question or evidence.

"Free thinking" isn't valuable, "Freedom of thought" is. I am not restricting freedom of thought. With the right to freedom of thought also comes the responsibility of ensuring that thought is realistic, logical, and readily verifiable before transmitting it to others.

If your ideas cannot stand upon evidence, they should not stand at all. Simple as that.

Open-mindedness alone is not a virtue. That is how you get indoctrinated. A mind must be open AND guarded against attack. Anything less is foolish.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– Judicator 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What in the flying fuck are you actually talking about?

This website is NOT operated by the military.
What regimented tone, and what condoning about the military?
WHEN did the military even get involved in this discussion?
What makes you think telepathy is even possible? Scientifically speaking such ideas are at BEST impractical. Realistically, the odds of there actually being a way to be able to make a functional telepathic network would be astronomically smaller than the odds that Joe Biden won by getting more legal and legitimate votes, which is already astonishingly unlikely.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q