“The majority does not rule, the law derived from a Constitution has the final say.
Not sure who all needs to hear this but we are not a Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic”
“every major individual of any consequence in the health field”
Translation: My science people with opinions I agree with only. Your doctors or scientists are of no consequence since they are stupid
Stealing = fortifying
And now
Disproven = anything already proven true or under review currently. Also any information that doesn’t conform to ds narrative.
If it was actually disproven that means media & gov't would 100% know who Q is.
Which is absolutely not the case.
Therefore, "disproven" = misinformation since it's technically 'still in review'.
How have the so easily changed the idea of discussion & reviewing something to mean 'disproven'? Drives me nuts.
Sounds like a good candidate for my list: War on words commie definitions explained
Holidays = social gatherings
Herd immunity > “community” immunity
Alleged = Question if this really happened cause someone dumb claims this
Cult member = faithful dedication to a belief deemed ridiculous.
melodrama = reasonable concerns to illegal actions by government
Churches = faith based venue faith-based organizations “Faith institutions” (turned into jails) Oregon covid guidelines 2021
Fact checker = opinion driven censorship Missinformation= conservative content
Democracy = ‘populace’ rule Republic = racist
“The majority does not rule, the law derived from a Constitution has the final say. Not sure who all needs to hear this but we are not a Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-post-claims-its-a-right-wing-talking-point-to-say-america-is-not-a-democracy
“every major individual of any consequence in the health field” Translation: My science people with opinions I agree with only. Your doctors or scientists are of no consequence since they are stupid
Stealing = fortifying
And now
Disproven = anything already proven true or under review currently. Also any information that doesn’t conform to ds narrative.
I think I’ll add my my most recent observations here as well. :)
Debunk: to discredit
Discredit: to cause to be doubted.
Vs.
Disprove: to PROVE to be false, invalid or in error. To refute (v).
Refute (v): overthrow by argument or PROOF.
Prove: to establish the truth or validity (of something) by the presentation of argument or EVIDENCE.
Is it any surprise that the left prefers the easiest path (debunk) because no evidence or work is required? Lol
That's about the best response to "debunked" that I've seen yet. IF Q had been debunked then we'd know the identity of Q