He may have been removed from his leadership duties after the whistleblower tape went public. Would make sense why suddenly the SC is going to hear VF cases.
Yeah, It makes sense that that a member of the demoncratic party who is trying to impeach Our President is presiding over the trial. Doesn't the MSM think that is a problem?
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Since Trump is not currently the President of the United States, the CJ does not have to preside...
Because it is an unconstitutional farce and even he knows it. A constitutionally valid senate trial would require his oversight to be legitimate
He may have been removed from his leadership duties after the whistleblower tape went public. Would make sense why suddenly the SC is going to hear VF cases.
Not only is this farce unconstitutional, but Roberts knew that there was no way Trump would be convicted.
Deep State RINO OR PEDO?
When he is in GITMO?!?! (Hopefully)
Yeah, It makes sense that that a member of the demoncratic party who is trying to impeach Our President is presiding over the trial. Doesn't the MSM think that is a problem?
Article I, Section 3, Clause 6:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Since Trump is not currently the President of the United States, the CJ does not have to preside...