They showed the picture in the link below as proof ?. People were on to BigFieldGhost. Many of his post and comments he was called a glowie and was disregarded ???. He had no followers for violence on jan 6th
Comments (3)
sorted by:
They showed the picture in the link below as proof ?. People were on to BigFieldGhost. Many of his post and comments he was called a glowie and was disregarded ???. He had no followers for violence on jan 6th
I had trouble with this, too. I quit going to TDW because it was so lackluster, but even when I was going, I never remember seeing this guy, and if you notice there are only a handful of replies to his post. Not very good "evidence" actually when you realize that the OP could be a shill and a lot of the replies could be him under different names. Sort of doesn't pass the credibility test. If this is the best they got, they got problems.
100% agree! I felt the majority of their proof was repetitive and very flawed. Showed very little and left way too many holes. Also, using news articles as proof? Weak in my opinion