Are they garbage or nah? Where do these lawyers fit into the plan?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Check out this thread. Good analysis. https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRGvFksK/impeachment-day-one--anon-analys/
I think the only purpose of this "trial" is to introduce a whole lot of election fraud evidence into the public record. That should start tomorrow and continue Saturday.
I believe that is why the two Trump lawyers are both former prosecutors. Evidence is all they do - it makes or breaks a prosecutor's whole case, every time. With lots of practice, they should be pretty good at that, one would think.
I agree with this assessment, but Trump could've picked some more eloquent people. The evidence is sufficient in and of itself but the presentation matters to the sheeple. Say what you will about the Dems, but they talked circles around the defense.
It's like your uncle who was a former mechanic vs a slick car salesman who'll take the shirt off your back. We all know who we would trust, but the average person only listens to sound bites.
That said, I hope the evidence they bring out is even more damning than the stuff we've seen already... can't wait until they're all locked up