Great... except that the Supreme Court hasn't exactly stepped in to stop the proceedings, now have they? They've had ample opportunity... but no action.
The same thing with the Election Fraud. The Supreme Court had ample opportunity to hear cases of coordinated voter fraud and election theft... but they have chosen to ignore it.
I don't want to hear any "righteous indignation" from any of these Supreme Court embarrassments. YOU failed our nation several times recently... so don't start claiming to care now.
I’m not so sure. I am not a scotus justice or constitutional scholar, but the Texas case seemed like it had real legs. I was shocked when they turned it down. Seemed to be a procedural reason of filing under Article 2 vs 3, so I was also surprised TX didn’t re-file the case appropriately. Anyways I think if Trump put 3 justices on and couldn’t get any of them to agree to hear any case, there’s some reason for that. It could be part of the plan or he could have picked 3 bad justices, I’m pretty sure it’s the plan.
Trump nominated 3 justices that were selected by McConnell and some bullshit deep state front group, who's name currently escapes me. He would have been better leaving the seats empty than filling them with deep state stooges.
Federalist Society I think it is, maybe you’re right, in which case the military is the only way. If Roberts has done what Lin Wood says he has, then that presents another good reason to use tribunals instead of civil courts including SCOTUS. Hopefully we are covered either way
Great... except that the Supreme Court hasn't exactly stepped in to stop the proceedings, now have they? They've had ample opportunity... but no action.
The same thing with the Election Fraud. The Supreme Court had ample opportunity to hear cases of coordinated voter fraud and election theft... but they have chosen to ignore it.
I don't want to hear any "righteous indignation" from any of these Supreme Court embarrassments. YOU failed our nation several times recently... so don't start claiming to care now.
I’m not so sure. I am not a scotus justice or constitutional scholar, but the Texas case seemed like it had real legs. I was shocked when they turned it down. Seemed to be a procedural reason of filing under Article 2 vs 3, so I was also surprised TX didn’t re-file the case appropriately. Anyways I think if Trump put 3 justices on and couldn’t get any of them to agree to hear any case, there’s some reason for that. It could be part of the plan or he could have picked 3 bad justices, I’m pretty sure it’s the plan.
Trump nominated 3 justices that were selected by McConnell and some bullshit deep state front group, who's name currently escapes me. He would have been better leaving the seats empty than filling them with deep state stooges.
Federalist Society I think it is, maybe you’re right, in which case the military is the only way. If Roberts has done what Lin Wood says he has, then that presents another good reason to use tribunals instead of civil courts including SCOTUS. Hopefully we are covered either way