GA.win GEORGE skeptics: There's nothing that would suggest GEORGE is linked to MI or Q.
GEORGEnews: Here's me in a Marine airplane, filming outside the back cargo bay at a plane with the numbers 737 on it.
Just an off hand comment, didn't mean there was any evidence he's involved with George, sorry. Was trying to be sarcastic, meant to impart that George is giving evidence that's it's close to Trump..... in my mind close like Scavino or similar.
Well, it's not like there's no connection now that I look at it more. Scavino served in the Trump administration as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications and Director of Social Media, and George released a lot of WH-related content for the 45th President. Wouldn't they have had to deal with each other at some point?
I am a George Skeptic. Why? Because it's healthy to be skeptical of things.
I don't believe you should swallow it hook line and sinker.
I'm also skeptical of Q because why trust the military? The military is full of warhawks. The military is full of people who think Q is a joke or that "Oh well we voted, as if the election was rigged".
As for George, I think what puts off a lot of people is the fact that straight away people on this very board started to believe the insanity that it was JFK Jr, resurrected. That's lunacy. Dude's dead.
GEORGE magazine was also not just JFK Jr's property. It's owned by a publishing holding company, whom Hearst control.
George is also a relative name to the US, not just JFK Jr.
I feel disappointed that the loons who believe JFK Jr is alive latched onto this, when they completely skimmed over the fact that historically, George Washington was more important than JFK and it being named George is much more likely a tie into George Washington and the amazing things he did for this nation, rather than JFK Jr. The ignorance of reality and true history in favor of confirming bias is disappointing.
That's why a lot of people are skeptical of George. It's not the information, it's the insane and undue reaction of the people latching on to it.
GA.win GEORGE skeptics: There's nothing that would suggest GEORGE is linked to MI or Q. GEORGEnews: Here's me in a Marine airplane, filming outside the back cargo bay at a plane with the numbers 737 on it.
...and they watermark the Pentagon, Dept of Defense, and "T45" too lol.
What do you guys need, Dan Scavino in a fireside chat with Dennis Prager talking about how he helped Q?
Wait, what's the connection between Dan Scavino and George?
Just an off hand comment, didn't mean there was any evidence he's involved with George, sorry. Was trying to be sarcastic, meant to impart that George is giving evidence that's it's close to Trump..... in my mind close like Scavino or similar.
Well, it's not like there's no connection now that I look at it more. Scavino served in the Trump administration as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications and Director of Social Media, and George released a lot of WH-related content for the 45th President. Wouldn't they have had to deal with each other at some point?
Even if George has absolutely nothing to do with Q, I would still watch them for the photos and videos alone.
I am a George Skeptic. Why? Because it's healthy to be skeptical of things.
I don't believe you should swallow it hook line and sinker.
I'm also skeptical of Q because why trust the military? The military is full of warhawks. The military is full of people who think Q is a joke or that "Oh well we voted, as if the election was rigged".
As for George, I think what puts off a lot of people is the fact that straight away people on this very board started to believe the insanity that it was JFK Jr, resurrected. That's lunacy. Dude's dead.
GEORGE magazine was also not just JFK Jr's property. It's owned by a publishing holding company, whom Hearst control.
George is also a relative name to the US, not just JFK Jr.
I feel disappointed that the loons who believe JFK Jr is alive latched onto this, when they completely skimmed over the fact that historically, George Washington was more important than JFK and it being named George is much more likely a tie into George Washington and the amazing things he did for this nation, rather than JFK Jr. The ignorance of reality and true history in favor of confirming bias is disappointing.
That's why a lot of people are skeptical of George. It's not the information, it's the insane and undue reaction of the people latching on to it.