This Bret Stephens editorial banned by the NY Times highlights *exactly* how our mods went off the rails a few days ago - "A hallmark of injustice is indifference to intention." - The Great Awakening

This Bret Stephens editorial banned by the NY Times highlights *exactly* how our mods went off the rails a few days ago - "A hallmark of injustice is indifference to intention." (nypost.com)

posted 3 years ago by BasedInFact 3 years ago by BasedInFact +19 / -6

13 comments

13 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (13)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +4 / -3

▲ 3 ▼

– BasedInFact [S] 3 points 3 years ago +4 / -1

Well, the first problem is that you are too stupid to be able to tell the difference between the NY Post and the NY Times... Off to a pretty bad start right there...

Ok, thank you for so able pointing out just how many retards orbit this place. If you had actually BOTHERED TO READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE, MORON, you would have learned that it is now published in the NY Post because IT WAS KILLED BY THE NEW YORK TIMES.

I love this place, but there ARE waaaay to many of you loudmouth low-IQ types around, and that's a damn shame.

For us.

Because I've now got to presume you just don't have any capacity for shame. Among other things.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Libraritarian 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Wow. Too lazy to even read the TITLE before name calling?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– BasedInFact [S] 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Yes. Hard to believe... and yet, at the same time, waaaaay too easy to believe, if you've been around here (or really, any web community, I guess... not trying to diss this place I love!)

So yes, his was a super low-effort comment, which appropriately produced a super high-irony result. ?

And I knew it was going to be embarrassing enough that he'd delete it... which is why I quoted it. Because I may be a little bit petty on occasion. ?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q