I suspect it's because that's not what the case is about. It's almost a trap. If you say "but there was fraud!" they can say we're claiming it was justified, when there wasn't an "insurrection". A riot? Maybe. An insurrection? No. And did Trump incite it? No.
I suspect it's because that's not what the case is about. It's almost a trap. If you say "but there was fraud!" they can say we're claiming it was justified, when there wasn't an "insurrection". A riot? Maybe. An insurrection? No. And did Trump incite it? No.